Classroom Assessment Principles to Support Learning and Avoid the Harms of Testing

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 52-57

  Shepard, L A ^a   Penuel, W R ^a   Pellegrino, J W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044422652     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/emip.12195     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alonzo, A. C., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (Forthcoming). Moving beyond misconceptions: Learning progressions as a lens for seeing progress in student thinking. The Physics Teacher, 56.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
3. Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Learning is the primary source of coherence in assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 35–38.
4. Dewey, J. (1902/1976). The child and curriculum. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 2, pp. 1–276). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
5. diSessa, A. A., & Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in learning and teaching science and mathematics (pp. 155–187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
7. Heritage, M. (2018). Making assessment work for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 39–41.
8. Hunt, E., & Minstrell, J. (1983). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Kolodner, J. L. (2014). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
10. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B. B., Gray, J. T., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547.
11. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). Learning progressions: The whole world is NOT a stage. Science Education, 99, 432–437.
12. Marion, S. F. (2018). The opportunities and challenges of a systems approach to assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 45–48.
13. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14. National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15. National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards. Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
16. Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2009). Preparing teachers to design instruction for deep understanding in middle school earth science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 461–508.
17. Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 787–850). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Perry, R., Marple, S., & Reade, F. (2017). Instructional materials: Who makes the choice? Findings from the Annual Survey on Implementing the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
19. Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? In C. Giudici, C. Rinaldi, & M. Krechevsky (Eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 78–89). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children Publications.
20. Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, 26(2), 10–26, 47–48.
22. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522.
23. Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759–771.
24. Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 531–564.
25. Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34.
26. Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988). A conspiracy of good intentions: America's textbook fiasco. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
27. Wiliam, D. (2018). How can assessment support learning? A response to Wilson, and Shepard, Penuel, and Pellegrino. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 42–44.
28. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2006). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Wilson, M. (2018). Making measurement important for education: The crucial role of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 5–20.