Overcoming the clash of legal cultures: The role of interactive arbitration

Arbitration International

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 157-172

  Cremades, Bernardo M ^a  

^a J y B Cremades y Asociados   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044295057     PISSN: 09570411     EISSN: 18758398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/14.2.157     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Channel Tunnel Group Limited v. Balfour Beatty Construction and Others [1993] 2 WLR 262
2. 'an essential feature of the English adversary system' (Mustill and Boyd, Commercial Arbitration (2nd ed, 1989) at p. 324)
3. Croall 'Misconceptions about Discovery in English Arbitration' in (1985) 51 Arbitration 539
4. Hunter, 'Arbitration Procedure in England: Past, Present and Future' in (1985) 1 Arbitration International 82
5. Reymond, 'Common Law and Civil Law Procedure: Which is the more Inquisitorial? A Civil Lawyer's Response' in (1989) 5 Arbitration International 357
6. Staughton, 'Common Law and Civil Law Procedure: Which is the more Inquisitorial? A Common Lawyer Response' in (1989) 5 Arbitration International 357
7. Hill-Sinicropi, Evidence in Arbitration (BNA Books, 1985, 2nd ed.) at pp. 72-75
8. Wetter, 'The Present Status of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC: An Appraisal' in 1 American Review of International Arbitration 91
9. Mustill, 'Arbitration: History and Background' in 6 Journal of International Arbitration 49
10. Redfern and Hunter, International Commercial Arbitration (London, Sweet and Maxwell 1992, 2nd ed.) at pp. 479 et seq.)