Two Bayesian approaches to rough sets

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 251, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 904-917

  Yao, Yiyu ^a   Zhou, Bing ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian classification rough sets; Bayesian confirmation rough sets; Confirmation theoretic rough sets; Decision theoretic rough sets; Probabilistic rough sets

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DECISION THEORY; INFERENCE ENGINES; PROBABILITY; SEMANTICS;

BAYESIAN CLASSIFICATION; BAYESIAN CONFIRMATION; BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY; CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES; DECISION-THEORETIC ROUGH SETS; PROBABILISTIC ROUGH SETS; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; THREE-WAY DECISIONS;

ROUGH SET THEORY;

EID: 85044252546     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.053     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Atteya, T.E.M., Rough multiple objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research 248:1 (2016), 204–210.
2. Brzezinska, I., Greco, S., Slowinski, R., Mining pareto-optimal rules with respect to support and confirmation or support and anti-support. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, vol. 20, no. 5, 2007, 587–600.
3. Domingos, P., Pazzani, M., Beyond independence: conditions for the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on machine learning, 1996, 105–112.
4. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Pattern classification and scene analysis, 1973, Wiley, New York.
5. Earman, J., Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory, 1992, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
6. Festa, R., Bayesian confirmation. Galavotti, M., Pagnini, A., (eds.) Experience, reality, and scientific explanation, 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 55–87.
7. Fitelson, B. (2001). Studies in Bayesian confirmation theory(Ph.D. dissertation). University of Wisconsin. http://fitelson.org/thesis.pdf.
8. Gebrezgabher, S.A., Meuwissen, M., Oude Lansink, A., A multiple criteria decision making approach to manure management systems in the netherlands. European Journal of Operational Research 232:3 (2014), 643–653.
9. Good, I.J., The estimation of probabilities: An essay on modern Bayesian methods, 1965, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
10. Goudey, R., Do statistical inferences allowing three alternative decision give better feedback for environmentally precautionary decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management 85 (2007), 338–344.
11. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Rough membership and bayesian confirmation measures for parameterized rough sets. Proceedings of RSFDGRC 2005, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 3641, 2005, 314–324.
12. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Parameterized rough set model using rough membership and bayesian confirmation measures. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 49 (2008), 285–300.
13. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R., Bayesian confirmation measures within rough set approach. Proceedings of RSCTC 2004, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 3066, 2004, 264–273.
14. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R., Can bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules?. Engineering Applications of Arificial Intelligence 17 (2004), 345–361.
15. Grzymala-Busse, J., Knowledge acquisition under uncertainty—A rough set approach. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 1 (1988), 3–16.
16. Grzymala-Busse, J., Marepally, S.R., Yao, Y.Y., An empirical comparison of rule sets induced by lers and probabilistic rough classification. Proceedings of RSCTC 2010, LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6086, 2010, 590–599.
17. Herbert, J.P., Yao, J.T., Game-theoretic risk analysis in decision-theoretic rough sets. Proceedings of RSKT 2008, LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5009, 2008, 132–139.
18. Kotlowski, W., Dembczynski, K., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., Stochastic dominance-based rough set model for ordinal classification. Information Sciences 178 (2008), 4019–4037.
19. Kotlowski, W., Słowiński, R., On nonparametric ordinal classification with monotonicity constraints. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25 (2013), 2576–2589.
20. Langley, P., Wayne, I., Thompson, K., An analysis of bayesian classifiers. Proceedings of the 10th national conference on artificial intelligence, 1992, 223–228.
21. Leung, Y., Wu, W.Z., Zhang, W.X., Knowledge acquisition in incomplete information systems: A rough set approach. European Journal of Operational Research 168 (2006), 164–180.
22. Li, Y., Zhang, C., Swanb, J.R., Rough set based model in information retrieval and filtering. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on information systems analysis and synthesis, 1999, 398–403.
23. Liu, F., Hua, Z.S., Lim, A., Identifying future defaulters: A hierarchical bayesian method. European Journal of Operational Research 241:1 (2015), 202–211.
24. Pauker, S.G., Kassirer, J.P., The threshold approach to clinical decision making. New England Journal of Medicine 302 (1980), 1109–1117.
25. Pawlak, Z., Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11 (1982), 341–356.
26. Pawlak, Z., Rough sets, theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
27. Pawlak, Z., Decision rules, bayes’ rule and rough sets. Proceedings of RSFDGRC 1999, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 1711, 1999, 1–9.
28. Pawlak, Z., Rough sets, decision algorithms and bayes’ theorem. European Journal of Operational Research 136 (2002), 181–189.
29. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A., Rough membership functions. Yager, R.R., Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, 1994, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 251–271.
30. Pawlak, Z., Wong, S.K.M., Ziarko, W., Rough sets: Probabilistic versus deterministic approach. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 29 (1988), 81–95.
31. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A., Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery: Methodology and Applications, vols. 1 and 2. 1998, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
32. Robinson, G., A statistical approach to the spam problem. Linux Journal, 2003(107), 2003, 3.
33. Ślȩzak, D., Rough Sets and Bayes Factor. Transactions on Rough Sets, Vol. III, 3400, 2005, LNCS, 202–229.
34. Ślȩzak, D., Wróblewski, J., Eastwood, V., Synak, P., Brighthouse: An analytic data warehouse for ad-hoc queries. Proceedings PVLDB 2008, 2008, 1337–1345.
35. Ślȩzak, D., Ziarko, W., Bayesian rough set model. Proceedings of FDM 2002, 2002, 131–135.
36. Ślȩzak, D., Ziarko, W., The investigation of the bayesian rough set model. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 40 (2005), 81–91.
37. Steel, D., Bayesian confirmation theory and the likelihood principle. Synthese 156 (2007), 53–77.
38. Talbot, W. (2001). Bayesian Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/epistemology-bayesian.
39. Tsumoto, S., Accuracy and coverage in rough set rule induction. Proceedings of RSCTC 2002, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 2475, 2002, 373–380.
40. Wald, A., Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 16 (1945), 117–186.
41. Wong, S.K.M., Ziarko, W., A probabilistic model of approximate classification and decision rules with uncertainty in inductive learning. Technical report cs-85-23, 1985, Department of Computer Science, University of Regina.
42. Wong, S.K.M., Ziarko, W., Algorithm for inductive learning, bulletin of the polish academy of science. Technical Science 34 (1986), 271–276.
43. Wong, S.K.M., Ziarko, W., Infer—An adaptive decision support system based on the probabilistic approximate classifications. Proceedings of 6th international workshop on expert systems and their applications, 1986, 713–726.
44. Woodward, P.W., Naylor, J.C., An application of bayesian methods in spc. The Statistician 42 (1993), 461–469.
45. Yao, Y.Y., Probabilistic approaches to rough sets. Expert Systems 20 (2003), 287–297.
46. Yao, Y.Y., Decision-theoretic rough set models. Proceedings of RSKT 2007, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 4481, 2007, 1–12.
47. Yao, Y.Y., A note on definability and approximations. Transactions on Rough Sets VII:LNCS 4400 (2007), 274–282.
48. Yao, Y.Y., Probabilistic rough set approximations. International Journal of Approximation Reasoning 49 (2008), 255–271.
49. Yao, Y.Y., Three-way decision: An interpretation of rules in rough set theory. Proceedings of RSKT 2009, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 5589, 2009, 642–649.
50. Yao, Y.Y., Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Information Sciences 180 (2010), 341–353.
51. Yao, Y.Y., The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models. Information Sciences 181 (2011), 1080–1096.
52. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts. International Journal of Man-machine Studies 37 (1992), 793–809.
53. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lingras, P., A decision-theoretic rough set model. Ras, Z.W., Zemankova, M., Emrich, M.L., (eds.) Methodologies for intelligent systems, vol. 5, 1990, North-Holland, New York, 17–24.
54. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N., An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. Proceedings of PAKDD 1999, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 1974, 1999, 479–488.
55. Yao, Y.Y., Zhou, B., Naive bayesian rough sets. Proceedings of RSKT 2010, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 6401, 2010, 719–726.
56. Zhang, H., Exploring conditions for the optimality of naive bayes. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 19 (2005), 183–198.
57. Zhao, W.Q., Zhu, Y.L., An email classification scheme based on decision-theoretic rough set theory and analysis of email security. Proceeding of 2005 IEEE region 10 tencon, 2005, 1–6.
58. Zhou, B., Yao, Y.Y., Comparison of two models of probabilistic rough sets. Proceedings of RSKT 2014, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 8171, 2013, 121–132.
59. Zhou, B., Yao, Y.Y., Luo, J.G., Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 42 (2014), 19–45.
60. Ziarko, W., Variable precision rough sets model. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 46 (1993), 39–59.
61. Ziarko, W., Set approximation quality measures in the variable precision rough set model. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on hybrid intelligent systems, 2002, 442–452.