Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits

Water Resources Management

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 2505-2522

  Alves, Alida ^a   Gersonius, Berry ^a   Sanchez, Arlex ^a   Vojinovic, Zoran ^a   Kapelan, Zoran ^b  

^a UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Co benefits; Decision making; Green grey infrastructure; Multi criteria analysis; Urban flooding

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FLOOD CONTROL; POPULATION STATISTICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

CO BENEFITS; FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT; FLOOD RISK REDUCTION; GREEN-GREY INFRASTRUCTURE; MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH; STANDALONE APPLICATIONS; URBAN FLOODING;

FLOODS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FLOODING; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 85043689844     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: 15731650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-1943-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alves A, Sanchez A, Vojinovic Z et al (2016) Evolutionary and Holistic Assessment of Green-Grey Infrastructure for CSO Reduction. Water 8:402
2. Bana e Costa CA, Antião da Silva P, Nunes Correia F (2004) Multicriteria evaluation of flood control measures: the case of Ribeira do Livramento. Water Resour Manag 18(3):263–283
3. Casal-Campos A, Fu G, Butler D, Moore A (2015) An Integrated Environmental Assessment of Green and Gray Infrastructure Strategies for Robust Decision Making. Environ Sci Technol 49:8307–8314
4. Center for Neighborhood Technology & Americans Rivers (2010) The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago
5. Cheng M-S, Zhen JX, Shoemaker L (2009) BMP decision support system for evaluating stormwater management alternatives. Front Environ Sci Eng China 3:453–463
6. Chow J, Savić D, Fortune D et al (2014) Using a Systematic, Multi-criteria Decision Support Framework to Evaluate Sustainable Drainage Designs. Procedia Eng 70:343–352
7. CIRIA (2013) Demonstrating the multiple benefits of SuDS – A business case (Phase 2)
8. Commission of the European Communities (2009) Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action
9. Department for Communities and Local Government: London (2009) Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. doi: 10.1002/mcda.399
10. Elliott A, Trowsdale S (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22:394–405
11. Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF et al (2014) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J. 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
12. Fratini CF, Geldof GD, Kluck J, Mikkelsen PS (2012) Three Points Approach (3PA) for urban flood risk management: A tool to support climate change adaptation through transdisciplinarity and multifunctionality. Urban Water J. 10.1080/1573062X.2012.668913
13. Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566
14. IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters To Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change. 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
15. Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century. The World Bank, Washington. 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
16. Jia H, Yao H, Tang Y et al (2013) Development of a multi-criteria index ranking system for urban runoff best management practices (BMPs) selection. Environ Monit Assess. 10.1007/s10661-013-3144-0
17. Karavokiros G, Lykou A, Koutiva I et al (2016) Providing Evidence-Based, Intelligent Support for Flood Resilient Planning and Policy: The PEARL Knowledge Base. Water 8:392
18. Liu Y, Ahiablame LM, Bralts VF, Engel BA (2015) Enhancing a rainfall-runoff model to assess the impacts of BMPs and LID practices on storm runoff. J Environ Manag 147:12–23
19. Lundy L, Wade R (2011) Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services. Prog Phys Geogr 35:653–669
20. Martin C, Ruperd Y, Legret M (2007) Urban stormwater drainage management: The development of a multicriteria decision aid approach for best management practices. Eur J Oper Res 181:338–349
21. Moura NCB, Pellegrino PRM, Martins JRS (2016) Best management practices as an alternative for flood and urban storm water control in a changing climate. J Flood Risk Manag 9:243–254
22. Naumann S, Rayment M, Nolan P, et al (2011) Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects. Final Report. Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting
23. Recanatesi F, Petroselli A, Ripa MN, Leone A (2017) Assessment of stormwater runoff management practices and BMPs under soil sealing: A study case in a peri-urban
24. Riabacke M, Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2012) State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation. Adv Decis Sci. 10.1155/2012/276584
25. RPA (2004) Evaluating a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) methodology for application to flood management and coastal defence appraisals. Risk and Policy Analysts Ltd., Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
26. Simonovic SP (2012) Floods in a Changing Climate: Risk Management. Cambridge University Press, New York
27. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S et al (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81:167–178
28. UDFCD (2010) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3, Stormwater Best Management Practice. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Water Resources Publications, Denver
29. United Nations (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). United Nations. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9
30. USEPA (2000) Low Impact Development (LID). A Literature Review. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
31. Vojinovic Z (2015) Flood Risk: The Holistic Perspective. From integrated to interactive planning for flood resilience. IWA Publishing, London
32. Vojinovic Z, Keerakamolchai W, Weesakul S et al (2016) Combining Ecosystem Services with Cost-Benefit Analysis for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure for Flood Protection in a Cultural Setting. Environment. 10.3390/environments4010003
33. Voskamp IM, Van de Ven FHM (2015) Planning support system for climate adaptation: Composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events. Build Environ 83:159–167
34. Woods-Ballard B, Kellagher R, Martin P, et al (2007) The SUDS manual. CIRIA, London
35. Young KD, Dymond RL, Asce M et al (2011) Development of an Improved Approach for Selecting Storm-Water Best Management Practices. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137:268–275
36. Young KD, Kibler DF, Benham BL, Loganathan GV (2009) Application of the Analytical Hierarchical Process for Improved Selection of Storm-Water BMPs. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:264–275