A literature review on integrated perinatal care

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Rodríguez, Charo ^a   Des Rivières Pigeon, Catherine ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cooperative clinical practice; Effectiveness; Integrated health care delivery; Perinatal care; Woman centred care

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043657184     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.202     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Anderson DA, Erickson KM, Mitchell JB. Remaking health care in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996.
2. Provan KG, Milward HB. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;40:1-33.
3. Rosenblatt A, Woodbridge MW. Deconstructing research on systems of care for youth with EBD: framework for policy research. Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders. 2003;11(1):25-35.
4. Contandriopoulos AP, Champagne F, Denis JL, Sicotte C, Lemay A, Arweiler D, et al. Financial incentives/disincentives in Canada's health system. Volume 1—Report (R96-04) Montréal: Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé (GRIS), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal; 1996.
5. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21.
6. Reid R, Haggerty J, McKendry R. Defusing the confusion: concepts and measures of continuity of health care. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2002.
7. Alter C, Hage J. Organisations working together. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.
8. Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C. Interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies. 2000;37(1):23-43.
9. Contandriopoulos AP, Denis JL, Touati N, Rodríguez R. Intégration des soins: dimensions et mise en œuvre. [Integrated care: dimensions and implementation]. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en santé 2002;8(2):38-52. [in French]
10. Benson JK. The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1975;20(2):229-49.
11. Avon Premature Infant Project. Randomised trial of parental support for families with very preterm children. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition. 1998 Jul;79(1):F4-F11.
12. Jamieson DJ, Buscher PA. The effect of family planning participation on prenatal care use and low birth weight. Family Planning Perspectives. 1992 Sep-Oct;24(5):214-8.
13. Oakley A. Using medical care: the views and experience of high-risk mothers. Health Services Research. 1991;26(5):651-70.
14. Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Naughton M, Meyer R, Lane K. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2003 Aug;102(2):273-8.
15. Boss DJ, Timbrook RE Fort Wayne Medical Education Research Group. Clinical obstetric outcomes related to continuity in prenatal care. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):418-23.
16. Carrington BW, Thompson RL, Mitchell JL, Namerow PB, Gordon T, Loftman PO, Williams SB. The need for family planning services for women delivering with little or no prenatal care. Women & Health. 1993;20(1):1-9.
17. Earle S. Pregnancy and the maintenance of self-identity: implication for antenatal care in the community. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2000;8(4):235-41.
18. D'Amour D, Goulet L, Pineault R, Labadie JF, Remondin M. Montréal: GRIS & FERASI; 2004. Étude comparée de la collaboration interorganisationnelle et de ses effets: le cas des services en périnatalité [in French]
19. Hemmimki E, Blondel B. Antenatal care in Europe: varying ways of providing high-coverage services. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, & Reproductive Biology. 2001 Jan;94(1):145-8.
20. Villar J, Carroli G, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G, Gülmezoglu M. Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001 Oct:4. (Art. No.: CD000934. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934) Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000934/frame.html.
21. Fink A, Yano EM, Goya D. Prenatal programs: what the literature reveals. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1992 Nov;80(5):867-72.
22. Henderson J, Roberts T, Sikorski J, Wilson J, Clement S. An economic evaluation comparing two schedules of antenatal visits. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2000 Apr;5(2):69-75.
23. Sikorski J, Wilson J, Clement S. A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal care. British Medical Journal. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):546-53.
24. Grossman LK, Humbert AJ, Powell M. Continuity of care between obstetrical and paediatric preventive care: indicators of non-attendance at the first well-child appointment. Clinical Pediatrics. 1996;35(11):563-69.
25. Halloran J, Gunn J, Young D. Shared obstetric care: the general practitioner's perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1992 Nov;32(4):301-5.
26. Bower KA. Case management and clinical path: strategies to support the perinatal experience. Journal of Obstetric, Gynaecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 1997 May-Jun;26(3):329-33.
27. Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000:1. (Art. No.: CD000062. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000062) Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000062/frame.html.
28. Giles W, Collins J, Ong F, MacDonald R. Antenatal care of low risk obstetric patients by midwives: a randomised controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia. 1992 Aug 3;157(3):158-61.
29. Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM. What do women feel about community-based antenatal care? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2000 Dec;24(6):590-5.
30. Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM, Sheehan A, Barclay LM, Wills J, Chapman MG. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001 Jan;108(1):16-22.
31. Homer CS, Davis GK, Cooke M, Barclay LM. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia. Midwifery. 2002 Jun;18(2):102-12.
32. Reinharz D, Blais R, Fraser WD, Contandriopoulos AP. L'Équipe d'évaluation des projets-pilotes sages-femmes. Cost-effectiveness of midwifery services vs. medical services in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;91(1):I12-5.
33. Farquhar M, Camilleri-Farrante C, Todd C. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme. Midwifery. 2000 Mar;16(1):35-47.
34. Hart A, Pankhurst FL, Sommerville F. An evaluation of team midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery. 1999;7(9):573-8.
35. Hicks C, Spurgeon P, Barwell F. Changing childbirth: a pilot project. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003 Jun;42(6):617-28.
36. Fraser W, Hatem-Asmar M, Krauss I, Maillard F, Bréart G, Blais R L'Équipe d'évaluation des projets-pilotes sages-femmes. Comparison of midwifery care to medical care in hospitals in the Quebec pilot projects study: clinical indicators. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;91(1):I5-I11.
37. Waldenström U, Turnbull D. A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998 Nov;105(11):1160-70.
38. Jackson DJ, Lant JM, Swartz WH, Ganiats TG, Fullerton J, Ecker J, et al. Outcomes, safety, and resource utilization in a collaborative care birth center program compared with traditional physician-based perinatal care. American Journal of Public Health. 2003 Jun;93(6):999-1006.
39. Waldenström U, Nilsson CA. Characteristics of women choosing birth central care. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1993;72(3):181-8.
40. Neuhaus W, Piroth C, Kiencke P, Gohring UJ, Mallman P. A psychosocial analysis of women planning birth outside hospital. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2002 Nov;22(2):143-9.
41. Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TL. Être ou ne pas être en bonne santé: Biologie et déterminants sociaux de la maladie. [To be or not to be in good health: biology and social determinants of disease]. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal; 1996. [in French]
42. Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Naughton M, Meyer R, Lane K. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2003 Aug;102(2):273-8.
43. Bensussen-Walls W, Saewyc EM. Teen-focused care versus adult-focused care for the high-risk pregnant adolescent: an outcome evaluation. Public Health Nursing. 2001 Nov-Dec;18(6):424-35.
44. Covington DL, Dalton VK, Diehl SJ, Wright BD, Piner MH. Improving detection of violence among pregnant adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1997 Jul;21(1):18-24.
45. Silva MO, Cabral H, Zuckerman B. Adolescent pregnancy in Portugal: effectiveness of continuity of care by an obstetrician. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1993 Jan;81(1):142-6.
46. Boss DJ, Timbrook RE Fort Wayne Medical Education Research Group. Clinical obstetric outcomes related to continuity in prenatal care. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):418-23.
47. European Collaborative Study. Pregnancy-related changes in the longer-term management of HIV-infected women in Europe. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, & Reproductive Biology. 2003 Nov 10;111(1):3-8.
48. Buesher PA, Roth MS, Williams D, Goforth CM. An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcome in North-Carolina. American Journal of Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1625-9.
49. Larson K, McGuire J, Watkins E, Mountain K. Maternal care coordination for migrant farmworker women: program structure and evaluation of effects on use of prenatal care and birth outcome. Journal of Rural Health. 1992 Spring;8(2):128-33.
50. National Childbirth Trust. Reconfiguring maternity services: views of user representatives. London: National Childbirth Trust; 2003.
51. Etzweiler DD. Chronic care: a need in search of a system. The Diabetes Educator. 1997 Sep-Oct;23(5):569-73.
52. Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. The Milbank Quarterly. 1999;77(1):77-110. iv-v.
53. Davies P. Making sense of integrated care in New Zealand. Australian Health Review. 1999;22(4):25-44. discussion 45-7.
54. Leggatt SG, Walsh M. From the bottom up and other lessons from down under. Health care Papers. 2000 Spring;1(2):37-46. discussion 104-7.
55. Hatem-Asmar M, Fraser W. La sage-femme du Québec: de la renaissance à la reconnaissance. [The midwife in Quebec: from rebirth to recognition]. Santé, Société et Solidarité 2004;1:105-15. [in French]
56. Pope R, Graham L, Patel S. Woman-centred care. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2001 Apr;38(2):227-38.
57. Rowley MJ, Hensley MJ, Brinsmead MW, Wlodarczyk JH. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial. Medical Journal of Australia. 1995 Sep 18;163(6):289-93.
58. Wyke S, Hewison J, Elton R, Posnett J, Macleod L, Ross-McGill H. Does general practitioner involvement in commissioning maternity care make a difference? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2001 Apr;6(2):99-104.