From research to evidence-informed decision making: A systematic approach

Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

Volumn 40, Issue , 2018, Pages i3-i12

  Poot, Charlotte C ^a   Van Der Kleij, Rianne M ^a   Brakema, Evelyn A ^a   Vermond, Debbie ^a   Williams, Siân ^b   Cragg, Liza ^b   Van Den Broek, Jos M ^c   Chavannes, Niels H ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b International Primary Care Respiratory Group   (United Kingdom)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Policy making; Public health; Science communication

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; SCIENTIST; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC HEALTH; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85043574042     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx153     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Bridging the 'Know-Do' Gap. Meeting on Knowledge Translation in Global Health. 10-12 October 2005, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.
2. Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26: 13-24.
3. Field B, Booth A, Ilott I et al. Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci 2014;9:172.
4. Brownson RC, Jones E. Bridging the gap: translating research into policy and practice. Prev Med 2009;49:313-5.
5. Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Res Policy 2001;30:333-49.
6. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M et al. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:239-44.
7. Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM et al. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q 2003;81:221-48, 171-2.
8. Choi BC, Pang T, Lin V et al. Can scientists and policy makers work together? J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:632-7.
9. Golden-Biddle K, Reay T, Petz S et al. Toward a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: the case of the researcherdecision- maker partnership. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8(Suppl 2): 20-5.
10. Cherney A, Head B, Boreham P et al. Perspectives of academic social scientists on knowledge transfer and research collaborations: a cross-sectional survey of Australian academics. Evid Policy 2012;8: 433-53.
11. Cvitanovic C, McDonald J, Hobday AJ. From science to action: principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making. J Environ Manage 2016;183:864-74.
12. Shanley P, López C. Out of the loop: why research rarely reaches policy makers and the public and what can be done. Biotropica 2009; 41:535-44.
13. Sorian R, Baugh T. Power of information: closing the gap between research and policy.
14. Stamatakis KA, McBride TD, Brownson RC. Communicating prevention messages to policy makers: the role of stories in promoting physical activity. J Phys Act Health 2010;7(Suppl 1): S99-107.
15. Lasswell HD. The structure and function of communication in society. In: Bryson L (ed). The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper, 1948:37-51.
16. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012;7:50.
17. Armstrong R, Waters E, Dobbins M et al. Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan. Implement Sci 2013;8:121.
18. Kirk A. Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data Driven Design, 1st edn. London: Sage Publications, 2016.
19. Polman JL, Gebre EH. Towards critical appraisal of infographics as scientific inscriptions. J Res Sci Teach 2015;52:868-93.
20. diSessa AA, Sherin BL. Meta-representation: an introduction. J Math Behavior 2000;19:385-98.
21. Zwald M, Jernigan J, Payne G et al. Developing stories from the field to highlight policy, systems, and environmental approaches in obesity prevention. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120141.
22. Slater MD, Rouner D. Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Commun Res 1996;23:210-35.
23. Denning S. Chapter 1: Telling the Right Story. The Leader's Guide to Storytelling: Mastering the Art and Discipline of Business Narrative, 2nd edn. San-Francisco: Wiley, 2005.
24. Dobbins M, Hanna SE, Ciliska D et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies. Implement Sci 2009;4:61.
25. Coleman R, Lieber P, Mendelson AL et al. Public life and the internet: if you build a better website, will citizens become engaged? New Media Soc 2008;10:179-201.
26. Shackel B. Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact Comput 2009;21:339-46.
27. Pandir M, Knight J. Homepage aesthetics: the search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity. Interact Comput 2006;18: 1351-70.
28. Pavlas D, Lum H, Salas E. The influence of aesthetic and usability web design elements on viewing patterns and user response: an eyetracking study. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2010;54: 1244-8.
29. Collaborative HCC. HealthCOMpass: From the Health Communication Capacity Collaborative. [cited 2017 15-05-2017]. http://www. thehealthcompass.org/.
30. Commission E. Science for Environment Policy. [updated 04-05- 2017; cited 2017 15-05-2017]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ integration/research/newsalert/index-en.htm.
31. Schneider F, van Osch L, de Vries H. Identifying factors for optimal development of health-related websites: a delphi study among experts and potential future users. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e18.
32. Ludden GD, van Rompay TJ, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. How to increase reach and adherence of web-based interventions: a design research viewpoint. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e172.
33. Gaines E. Media Literacy and Semiotics. Palgrave: Macmillan, US, 2010 10-03-2017]. http://www.rasaneh.org/Images/News/AtachFile/18- 7-1391/FILE634853701396680000.pdf.
34. van den Broek J, Koetsenruijter W, de Jong J et al. Chapter 5 Semiotics: The Meaning of What We See. Visual Language: Perspectives for Both Makers and Users, 1st edn. The Hague, The Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2012:71-4.
35. Siddiqi K, Newell JN. Putting evidence into practice in low-resource settings. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:882.
36. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:724-31; discussion 32.
37. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. J Am Med Assoc 2003;289:1969-75.
38. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(Suppl 1):S115-23.
39. VanDevanter N, Kumar P, Nguyen N et al. Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system. Implement Sci 2017;12:27.
40. Siron S, Dagenais C, Ridde V. What research tells us about knowledge transfer strategies to improve public health in low-income countries: a scoping review. Int J Public Health 2015;60:849-63.
41. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. Br Med J 2017;356:i6795.
42. Cragg L, Williams S, Chavannes NH. FRESH AIR: an implementation research project funded through Horizon 2020 exploring the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of chronic respiratory diseases in low-resource settings. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2016;26:16035.
43. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012;7:50.
44. Burls A. What is Critical Appraisal? London: Hayward Medical Communications, 2009.
45. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. Br Med J 2001;323:334-6.
46. Tyndall J. How low can you go? Toward a hierarchy of grey literature. Alice Springs, Australia, 2008.
47. Abras C, Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J. User-Centered Design. Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction: When Science Fiction Becomes Science Fact. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2005:763-8.
48. IDEO. Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015. IDEO.org (20 April 2017, date last accessed).
49. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13-24.
50. Castro-Sanchez E, Spanoudakis E, Holmes AH. Readability of ebola information on websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:1217-9.
51. Stout PA, Villegas J, Kim H. Enhancing learning through use of interactive tools on health-related websites. Health Educ Res 2001;16:721-33.
52. Sutton C. Sharing Knowledge: EC-funded Projects on Scientific Information in the Digital Age-Conclusions of a Strategic Workshop. In: Innovation GfRa-D (ed). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011.
53. Lavis JN. Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:37-45.
54. Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Br Med J 2007;334:129-32.
55. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst 2009;7:I1.
56. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362: 1225-30.