Detecting key sentences for automatic assistance in peer reviewing research articles in educational sciences

ACL-IJCNLP 2009 - NLPIR4DL 2009: 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 36-44

  Sándor, Ágnes ^a   Vorndran, Angela ^b  

^a XEROX RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPE   (France)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC ASSISTANCE; CONTENT LEVEL; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE; NLP SYSTEMS; PEER REVIEWING; REVIEWING PROCESS; SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE; SPEED UP; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85043289314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Salah Aït-Mokhtar, Jean-Pierre Chanod, and Claude Roux. 2002. Robustness beyond shallowness: incremental dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 8(2/3):121-144.
2. Robin Barrow. 2008. Education and the Body: Prole-gomena. British Journal of Educational Studies 56(3):272-285.
3. Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2003. Begutachtung durch Fachkollegen in der Wissenschaft. Stand der Forschung zur Reliabilität, Fairness und Validität des Peer-Review-Verfahrens. Universität auf dem Prüfstand. Konzepte und Befunde der Hochschulforschung. (S. Schwarz and U. Teichler, Eds.). Campus Verlag Frankfurt/New York: 207-225.
4. Paul Brett. 1994. A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1):47-59.
5. st EERQI Workshop, 20-21 June 2008. Leuven. Project Internal Document.
6. Javier Couto and Jean-Luc Minel. 2007. NaviTexte: a Text Navigation Tool. Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 4733, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
7. Susanne Fiedler. 1991. Fachtextlinguistische Untersuchungen zum Kommunikationsbereich der Pädagogik dargestellt an relevanten Fachtextsorten im Englischen. Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
8. Richard Holmes. 1997. Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4):321-337.
9. Noriko Kando. 1997. Text-level structure of research papers: Implications for text-based information processing systems. Proceedings of the 19th British Computer Society Annual Colloquium of Information Retrieval Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK, 68-81.
10. Elizabeth D. Liddy. 1991. The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study. Information Processing and Management, 27(1):55-81.
11. Frédérique Lisacek, Christine Chichester, Aaron Kaplan, and Ágnes Sandor. 2005. Discovering paradigm shift patterns in biomedical abstracts: application to neurodegenerative diseases. First International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine, Cambridge, UK, April 11-13, 2005.
12. Yanping Lu. 2005. Editorial Peer Review in Education: Mapping the Field. Australian Association for Research in Education 2004 conference papers, Melbourne, Australia (Jeffery, P. L., Ed.):1-19.
13. Yanping Lu. 2008. Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective. Learned Publishing, 21(3):307-316.
14. Eric G. Meinberg and Peter J. Stern. 2003. Incidence of Wrong-Site Surgery Among Hand Surgeons. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:193-197.
15. Yoko Mizuta, Anna Korhonen, Tony Mullen, and Nigel Collier. 2006. Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(6):468-87.
16. Michaela Montesi and John Mackenzie Owen. 2008. Research journal articles as document genres: exploring their role in knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, 64(1):143-167.
17. Robert N. Oddy, Elizabeth D. Liddy, Bhaskaran Balakrishnan, Ann Bishop, Joseph Elewononi and Eileen Martin. 1992. Towards the use of situational information in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 48(2):123-171.
18. Yang Ruiying and Desmond Allison. 2004. Research articles in applied linguistics: structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3):264-279.
19. Ágnes Sándor, Aaron Kaplan and Gilbert Rondeau. 2006. Discourse and citation analysis with concept-matching. International Symposium: Discourse and document (ISDD), Caen, France, June 15-16, 2006.
20. Ágnes Sándor. 2007. Modeling metadiscourse conveying the author's rhetorical strategy in biomedical research abstracts. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 200(2):97-109.
21. Ágnes Sándor. 2009. Automatic detection of discourse indicating emerging risk. To appear in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines. Risk as Discourse - Discourse as Risk: Interdisciplinary perspectives.
22. Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):409-445.
23. Victoria Uren, Simon Buckingham Shum, Clara Mancini, and Gangmin Li. 2007. Modelling Naturalistic Argumentation in Research Literatures: Representation and Interaction Design Issues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, (Special Issue on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Eds: C. Reed and F. Grasso), 22(1):17-47.
24. Richard Whitley and Jochen Gläser. 2007. The Changing Governance of Sciences: The Advent Of Research Evaluation Systems. Springer