Towards a precise definition of the OMG/MDA framework

Proceedings - 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 273-280

  Bézivin, Jean ^a   Gerbé, Olivier ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

'CURRENT; COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES; MODELING TECHNOLOGY; OBJECT COMPOSITION; OBJECT MANAGEMENT; OBJECT TECHNOLOGY; PARADIGM SHIFTS; PRECISE DEFINITION; SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION; TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 85043285104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2001.989813     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. G. Amati and I. Ounis. Conceptual Graphs and First Order Logic. The Computer Journal, 43(1), 2000.
2. C. Atkinson. Supporting and Applying the UML Conceptual Framework. In J. Bezivin and P. A. Muller, editors, Proceedings of UML'98, Beyond the Notation, Mulhouse, France, 1998. Springer Verlag. LNCS 1618.
3. C. Atkinson and T. Kühne. The Essence of Multilevel Metamodeling. In Proceedings of UML'2001 Conference on Modeling Languages, Concepts and Tools, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 1-5 2001.
4. M. Belaunde. A Standalone Metamodel for Expressing Model Relationships. 2001. Available at http://universalis.elibel.tm.fr/publications/RelationshipMetamodelV02.pdf.
5. M. Chein and M.L. Mugnier. Conceptual Graphs: Fundamental Notions. Revue d'intelligence artificielle,6(4):365-406,1992.
6. CDIF Technical Committee. CDIF: Case Data Interchange Format, Framework for Modeling and Extensibility. Electronics Industry Associate, 1994. Interim Standard EIA/IS-107.
7. S. Crawley, S. Davis, J. Indulska, S. McBride, and K. Raymond. Meta-Meta is Better-Better. October 1997.
8. D. DSouza. OMG's MDA, An Architecture for Modeling, 2001. OMG document available at http://www.omg.org/mda/presentations.htm.
9. J. Ernst. Introduction to CDIF, 1997. Available at www.metamodel.com.
10. M. Genesereth. Knowledge Interchange Format - draft proposed American National Standard (dpANS) NCTIS.T2/98-004, 1998. Available at http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html.
11. O. Gerbé and B. Kerhervé. Modeling and Metamodeling Requirements for Knowledge Management. In J. Bezivin, J. Ernst, and W. Pidcock, editors, Proceedings of OOPSLA Workshop on Model Engineering with CDIF, Vancouver, Canada, October 1998.
12. Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, 1997. OMG Document AD/97-08-14.
13. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language Specification, 1999. OMG Document AD/99-06-08.
14. Object Management Group and R. Soley. Model-Driven Architecture, 2000. OMG document available at www.omg.org.
15. N. Guarino and C. Welty. Towards a methodology for ontology based model engineering. In International Workshop on Model Engineering (in conjunction with ECOOP'2000), Nice/Sophia Antipolis, France, June 2000. Available at http://www.metamodel.com/TWMEOO/program.htrnl.
16. N. Houser, D. Roberts, and J. Van Evra. Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press, 1997.
17. ANSIIRDS. Conceptual Schema and Modeling Language Analysis, 1993. Technical Report X3H4/93-196.
18. R. Lemesle. Transformation Rules Based on Metamodeling. In Proceedings of EDOC'98, pages 113-122, La Jolla, CA, November 1998.
19. R. Lemesle. Techniques de modelisation et de meta-modelisation. PhD thesis, Universite de Nantes, 2000.
20. J. Sowa. Conceptual Structure: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, 1984.
21. J. Sowa. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. BrooksCole, 2000.