A Revision of current models for environmental and human health impact and risk assessment for application to emerging chemicals

Handbook of Environmental Chemistry

Volumn 23, Issue , 2013, Pages 91-108

  Rovira, J ^a   Nadal, M ^a   Domingo, J L ^a   Tanaku, T ^b   Suciu, N A ^b   Trevisan, M ^b   Capri, E ^b   Segui X ^c   Darbra, R M ^c   Schuhmacher, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Environmental and risk assessment models; Life cycle impact assessment models; Physicochemical and toxicological database

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042791678     PISSN: 1867979X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/698_2012_171     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003) Descriptions of selected key generic terms used in chemical hazard/risk assessment. ENV/JM/MONO(2003)15. OECD Series on Testing and assessment 44
2. Fazil AM (2005) A primer on risk assessment modelling: focus on seafood products. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Fisheries technical Paper, Rome
3. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (2003) Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances; Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market
4. Suciu N, Tanaka T, Trevisan M, Schuhmacher M, Nadal M, Rovira J, Segui X, Casal J, Darbra RM, Capri E (2012) Environmental fate models. Hdb Env Chem. doi:10.1007/698_2012_177
5. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment EPA/630/P-03/001F. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
6. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC
7. Olsen SI, Christensen FM, Hauschild M et al (2001) Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals -a methodological comparison. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:385-404
8. EC (2004) European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances 2.0 (EUSES 2.0). Prepared for the European Chemicals Bureau by the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands (RIVM Report no. 601900005). http:// ecb.jrc.it. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
9. Rosenbaum R, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox: the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532-546
10. Rosenbaum R, Margni M, Jolliet O (2007) A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. Environ Int 33:624-634
11. Sleeswijk AW, Heijungs R (2010) GLOBOX: a spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. Sci Total Environ 408:2817-2832
12. Stewart RN, Purucker ST (2011) An environmental decision support system for spatial assessment and selective remediation. Environ Model Softw 26:751-760
13. Batiha MA, Kadhum AAH, Batiha MM et al (2010) MAFRAM - a new fate and risk assessment methodology for non-volatile organic chemicals. J Hazard Mater 181:1080-1087
14. Breeze web (2012) http://www.breeze-software.com/riskanalyst/. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol (HHRAP) for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities (Final) EPA530-R-05-006 Office of Solid Waste. Washington, DC
16. Lakes Environmental web (2012) http://www.weblakes.com/index.html. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
17. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Protocol (SLERAP) for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities EPA 530-D-99-001A. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC
18. Gobas FAPC, Pasternak JP, Lien K et al (1998) Development and field validation of a multimedia exposure assessment model for waste load allocation in aquatic ecosystems:application to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in the Fraser river watershed. Environ Sci Technol 32:2442-2449
19. Groundwater software web (2012) http://www.groundwatersoftware.com/. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
20. ECOLEGO web (2012) http://ecolego.facilia.se/ecolego/show/HomePage. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
21. Palisade web (2012) More information available at: http://www.palisade.com/risk/. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
22. Varshney P (1998) Commentary on API’s DSS. J Soil Contam 7:275-282
23. Seuntjens P, Steurbaut W, Vangronsveld J (2006) Chain model for the impact analysis of contaminants in primary food products. Study report of the Belgian Science Policy. Brusels, Belgium
24. Health and Safety laboratory (2002) Toxic RISKAT version 3.1 - the Inclusion of the Site Risk Methodology. Report No HSL/2002/Z27. Sheffield, UK
25. EOSCA web (2012) http://www.eosca.com/NECCS/Index.htm. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
26. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J LCA 8:324-330
27. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
28. Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2005) User Manual for the Internet Version of the Danish (Q)SAR Database. http://130.226.165.14/User_Manual_Danish_Database.pdf. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
29. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) User’s Guide for T.E.S.T. version 4.0 A Program to Estimate Toxicity from Molecular Structure United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/cppb/qsar/. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
30. Benfenati E (2010) The CAESAR project for in silico models for the REACH legislation. Chem Cent J 4:I1
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Methodology document for the ecological Structure-Activity Relationship Model (ECOSAR) Class Program MS-Windows Version 1.1 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/ oppt/newchems/tools/ecosartechfinal.pdf. Accessed 09 Mar 2012
32. OECD QSAR (2012) http://www.qsartoolbox.org/index.html. Accessed 09 Mar 2012