Effects of diameter, number and tightness of sutures on pancreatic injury response

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 269-277

  Lämsä, Teemu ^a   Jin, Hai Tao ^a   Nordback, Panu H ^a   Sand, Juhani ^a   Nordback, Isto ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Injury response; Pancreas; Pancreatic histology; Polydioxanone; Surgery; Suture; Tissue injury

Indexed keywords

3 O POLYDIOXANONE; 6 O POLYDIOXANONE; POLYDIOXANONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMYLASE BLOOD LEVEL; ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; NUMBER OF NEEDLE PASSES; PANCREAS INJURY; PANCREAS SURGERY; PARAMETER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RAT; SHAM PROCEDURE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SUTURE DIAMETER; SUTURE TIGHTNESS;

EID: 85042613769     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000135604     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Raty S, Sand J, Nordback I: Detection of post-operative pancreatitis after pancreatic surgery by urine trypsinogen strip test. Br J Surg 2007;94:64-69.
2. Raty S, Sand J, Lantto E, Nordback I: Postoperative acute pancreatitis as a major determinant of postoperative delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1131-1139.
3. Gress F, Michael H, Gelrud D, et al: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:864-867.
4. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A: EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:700-708.
5. Lightwood R, Reber HA, Way LW: The risk and accuracy of pancreatic biopsy. Am J Surg 1976;132:189-194.
6. Jamieson C, Bury KD, Colapinto ND: Evaluation of intraoperative biopsy of the pancreas. Can J Surg 1977;20:546-550.
7. Lamsa T, Jin H, Mikkonen J, Laukkarinen J, Sand J, Nordback I: Biocompatibility of a new bioabsorbable radiopaque stent material (BaSO4 containing poly-L,D-lactide) in the rat pancreas. Pancreatology 2006;6:301-305.
8. Nevalainen TJ, Aho HJ: Standards of morphological evaluation and histological grading in experimental acute pancreatitis. Eur Surg Res 1992;24(suppl 1):14-23.
9. Niederau C, Liddle RA, Ferrell LD, Grendell JH: Beneficial effects of cholecystokinin-receptor blockade and inhibition of proteolytic enzyme activity in experimental acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis in mice. Evidence for cholecystokinin as a major factor in the development of acute pancreatitis. J Clin Invest 1986;78:1056-1063.
10. Schmidt J, Rattner DW, Lewandrowski K, et al: A better model of acute pancreatitis for evaluating therapy. Ann Surg 1992;215:44-56.
11. Lorentz K: Approved recommendation on IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes. 9. IFCC method for alpha-amylase (1,4-alpha-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1). International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Committee on Enzymes. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:185-203.
12. Costa IP, Lazaro da Silva A, Gobbi H: Comparative study of the suture of pancreatic stump with absorbable and unabsorbable threads in rats. Arq Gastroenterol 1995;32:24-30.
13. Sapy P, Miko I, Furka I: Comparison of suture materials in the pancreas. Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung 1982;23:209-216.
14. Case RM: Is the rat pancreas an appropriate model of the human pancreas? Pancreatology 2006;6:180-190.
15. Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, D'Angelo D: Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631). Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:137-141.
16. Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F: In vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS. Can J Surg 1988;31:43-45.
17. Muftuoglu MA, Ozkan E, Saglam A: Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials. Am J Surg 2004;188:200-203.
18. Lerwick E: Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:51-55.
19. Thomson SR, Gregory MA, Mars M, Natasen J, Naicker T, Baker LW: Morphological aspects of microarterial anastomoses: a comparison of nylon with polydioxanone. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:165-171.
20. Docobo-Durantez F, Sacristan-Perez C, Flor-Civera B, Lledo-Matoses S, Kreisler E, Biondo S: Randomized clinical study of polydioxanone and nylon sutures for laparotomy closure in high-risk patients. Cir Esp 2006;79:305-309.
21. Stewart DW, Buffington PJ, Wacksman J: Suture material in bladder surgery: a comparison of polydioxanone, polyglactin, and chromic catgut. J Urol 1990;143:1261-1263.
22. Nordback I: Value of monitoring amylase activities in patients with pancreatitis. Lancet 1985;i:1092.
23. Bhatia M: Inflammatory response on the pancreatic acinar cell injury. Scand J Surg 2005;94:97-102.
24. Bentrem DJ, Joehl RJ: Pancreas: healing response in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2003;31:S582-S589.