Feenberg, rationality and isolation

Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 91-113

  Lawson, Clive ^a  

^a GIRTON COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042600291     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57897-2_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Adorno, Theodor and Max Horkheimer. “Towards a New Manifesto?” New Left Review, no. 65 (Sep-Oct 2010): 33-61.
2. Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester, 1978.
3. Feenberg, Andrew. Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. MIT Press 2010.
4. Feenberg, Andrew. “From Critical Theory of Technology to the Rational Critique of Rationality.” Social Epistemology 22, no. 1 (2008): 5-28.
5. Feenberg, Andrew. “Marxism and the Critique of Social Rationality: From Surplus Value to the Politics of Technology.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, no. 1 (Jan 2010): 37-49.
6. Feenberg, Andrew. The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukacs and the Frankfurt School. New edition. ed. London: Verso, 2014.
7. Feenberg, Andrew. “Science, Technology and Democracy: Distinctions and Connections.” http://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/Science%20and%20Democracy2.htm (2009).
8. Feenberg, Andrew. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
9. Giddens, Anthony. Politics and Sociology in the Thought of Max Weber. London: Macmillan, 1972.
10. Habermas, Jürgen. Towards a Ratioanl Society. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapirio. Boston: Beacon Press, 1970.
11. Harré, Rom and Edward H. Madden. Causal Powers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.
12. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. [S.l.] Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell, (1978), 1962.
13. Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. 1st ed.Translated with an Introduction by William Lovitt. Harper Colophon Books New York: Harper &Row, 1977.
14. Horkheimer, Max. “The Latest Attack on Metaphysics.” In Critical Theory; Selected Essays, xxi, 290 p. New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.
15. Horkheimer, Max. “Reason against Itself—Some Remarks on Enlightenment.” Theory Culture &Society 10, no. 2 (May 1993): 79-88.
16. Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.
17. Lawson, Clive. “Ayres, Technology and Technical Objects.” Journal of Economic Issues 43, no. 3 (Sep 2009): 641-59.
18. Horkheimer, Max. “An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions.” Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12, no. 1 (2008).
19. Horkheimer, Max. Technology and Isolation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
20. Horkheimer, Max. “Technology and the Extension of Human Capabilities.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40, no. 2 (2010): 207-23.
21. Horkheimer, Max. “Technology, Technological Determinism and the Transformational Model of Technical Activity.” In Contributions to Social Ontology, edited by Clive Lawson, John Latsis and Nuno Martins, 32-49. London: Routledge, 2007.
22. Lukács, Geörg. History and Class Consciousness; Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971.
23. Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.
24. Marcuse, Herbert. “Nature and Revolution.” In In Counterrevolution and Revolt, p. 138. Boston: Beacon Press, 1972.
25. Simondon, Gilbert. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Translated by Cecile Malaspina. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing, 2010.
26. Weber, Max. The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Scribners, 1958.