Understanding the complexities of retractions recommended resources

College and Research Libraries News

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 38-42

  Riegelman, Amy ^a   Bakker, Caitlin ^b  

^a Social sciences librarian ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042587337     PISSN: 00990086     EISSN: 21506698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/crln.79.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. U.S. National Library of Medicine, “Key MEDLINE Indicators Archive: FY2005-2009,” 2013, https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/bsd_key_archive3.html; U.S. National Library of Medicine, “Key MEDLINE Indica-tors,” 2016, https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/bsd_key.html.
2. Caitlin Bakker and Amy Riegelman, “The Complexities of Retractions: Data Integrity, Discovery, and Tools,” Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2017, Seattle, Washington, https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/7cxak.
3. Philip M. Davis, “The Persistence of Error: A Study of Retracted Articles on the Internet and in Personal Libraries,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.008.184.
4. Daniele Fanelli, “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data,” PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.