Truth and consequence: Complementing logic with values in legal reasoning

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 9-20

  Bench Capon, T J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042574104     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600830123279     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aleven, V., 1997. Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models, The University of Pittsburg. PhD Thesis
2. Ashley, K.D., 1990. Modelling Legal Argument, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
3. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on AI and Law. Oslo.
4. Berman, D., and Hafner, C., Representing teleological structure in legal reasoning. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law. Amsterdam.
5. Branting, L.K., Reasoning with portions of precedents. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law. Oxford.
6. Grasso, F., Cawley, A., and Jones, R., 2000. Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53: 1077–1115.
7. Kowalski, A., Case-based reasoning and the deep structure approach to knowledge representation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law. Vancouver.
8. Moles, R.N., 1987. Definition and Rule in Legal Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Perelman, C., 1980. Justice, Law and Argument, Reidel, Dordrecht: Reidel.
10. Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., 1969. The New Rhetoric, Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
11. Prakken, H. (2000) An Exercise in Formalising Teleological Reasoning. Private Communication. Draft of a Paper to be submitted to AI and Law.
12. Prakken, H., and Sartor, G., 1998. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2-4: 231–87.
13. Reed, C., The role of saliency in generating natural language arguments. Proceedings of the sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stockholm.
14. Twining, W., and Miers, D., 1976. How To Do Things With Rules, London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.