Low tidal volume positive end-expiratory pressure versus high tidal volume zero-positive end-expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary functions in robot-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Medical Principles and Practice

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 573-578

  Haliloglu, Murat ^a   Bilgili, Beliz ^a   Ozdemir, Mehtap ^b   Umuroglu, Tumay ^a   Bakan, Nurten ^b  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b Umraniye Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Low tidal volume; Pneumoperitoneum; Positive end expiratory pressure; Pulmonary function; Robot Assisted surgery; Steep Trendelenburg

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; MORPHINE; OXYGEN;

ADULT; ALKALOSIS; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASSISTED VENTILATION; ATELECTASIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; FORCED VITAL CAPACITY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LUNG ALVEOLUS OXYGEN TENSION; LUNG FUNCTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORMAL VALUE; NUMERIC RATING SCALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OXYGENATION; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; PH; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL ATELECTASIS SCORE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE ASSESSMENT; ROBOT-ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMY; SPIROMETRY; SURGICAL PATIENT; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TIDAL VOLUME; TREATMENT DURATION; VENTILATED PATIENT; ZERO END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; AGED; BLOOD; LAPAROSCOPY; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; PROCEDURES; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 85042503983     PISSN: 10117571     EISSN: 14230151     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000484693     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300.
2. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al: Perioperative outcomes of robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 679-685.
3. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al: Current status of robot-Assisted surgery in urology: A multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 2009; 16: 4736-4741.
4. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, et al: Downsides of robot-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 735-746.
5. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al: Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-Assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 864-868.
6. Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, et al: Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 433-439.
7. Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, et al: Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 1069-1075.
8. Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, et al: The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): A prospective study. JAMA 1995; 273: 117-123.
9. Gu W-J, Wang F, Liu JC: Effect of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery: A meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 2015; 187:E101-E109.
10. Tao T, Bo L, Chen F, et al: Effect of protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: A meta-Analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e005208.
11. Futier E, Jaber S: Lung-protective ventilation in abdominal surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care 2014; 20: 426-430.
12. Schultz MJ, Abreu MG, Pelosi P: Mechanical ventilation strategies for the surgical patient. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 351-357.
13. Park SH: Perioperative lung-protective ventilation strategy reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracic and major abdominal surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69: 3-7.
14. Park SJ, Kim BG, Qh AH, et al: Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: Prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 4598-4606.
15. Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, et al: Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1310-1319.
16. Ferrando C, Soro M, Canet J, et al: Rationale and study design for an Individualized Perioperative Open Lung Ventilatory Strategy (iPROVE): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 193.
17. Lindberg P, Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, et al: Atelectasis and lung function in the postoperative period. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 546-553.
18. Kilic OF, Börgers A, Köhne W, et al: Effects of steep Trendelenburg position for robotic-Assisted prostatectomies on intra-And extrathoracic airways in patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 70-76.