The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcome in patients with asherman’s syndrome post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis

International Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2018, Pages 77-82

  Baradwan, Saeed ^a   Shafi, Dina ^a   Baradwan, Amira ^b   Bashir, Muhammad Salman ^a   Al Jaroudi, Dania ^a  

^a KING FAHAD MEDICAL CITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b King Abdulaziz University   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Asherman s syndrome; Endometrial thickness; Intrauterine adhesion; Operative hysteroscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMENORRHEA; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; ENDOMETRITIS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPIC ADHESIOLYSIS; HYSTEROSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL HISTORY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MYOMECTOMY; OLIGOMENORRHEA; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREMATURE LABOR; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; UTERUS SYNECHIA;

EID: 85042466709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S151283     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Dietterich C. Influence of endometrial thickness and echo patterns on pregnancy rates during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(6):1173-1175.
2. Senturk LM, Erel CT. Thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(3):221-228.
3. Foix A, Bruno RO, Davison T, Lema B. The pathology of postcurettage adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;96(7):1027-1033.
4. McCulloch TA, Wagner B, Duffy S, Barik S, Smith JH. The pathology hysterectomy specimens following trans-cervical resection of the endometrium. Histopathology. 1995;27(6):541-547.
5. Katz Z, Ben-Arie A, Lurie S, Manor M, Insler V. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in Asherman’s syndrome. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996;41(5):462-465.
6. Buckley CH. Normal endometrium and non-proliferative conditions of the endometrium. In: Fox H, Wells M, editors. Obstetrical and Gynaecological Pathology. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:391-442.
7. Wamsteker K, Blok SD. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation. In: Sutton C, Diamond M, editors. Endoscopic Surgery for Gynecologists. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1993.
8. Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(3):258-263.
9. Preutthipan S, Linasmita V. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions: a result of 65 cases at Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2000;83(1):42-46.
10. March C, Israel R. Intrauterine adhesions secondary to elective abortion. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;48(4):422-429.
11. Bhandari S, Bhave P, Ganguly I, Baxi A, Agarwal P. Reproductive outcome of patients with Asherman’s syndrome: a SAIMS experience. J Reprod Infertil. 2015;16(4):229-235.
12. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):759-779.
13. Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):715-722.
14. Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Kachawa G, Singh N. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(2):355-361.
15. Conforti A, Alviggi C, Mollo A, De Placido G, Magos A. The management of Asherman syndrome: a review of literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:118.
16. Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, Kaali SG. The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2337-2341.
17. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(3):418-421.
18. Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z. Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(4):919-922.
19. Rinaldi L, Lisi F, Floccari A, Lisi R, Pepe G, Fishel S. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization but not after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(7):1538-1541.
20. Yuval Y, Lipitz S, Dor J, Achiron R. The relationships between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(4):1067-1071.
21. De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider HP. Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):106-113.
22. Schield RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, Hansmann M. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):361-366.
23. Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(1):147-149.
24. Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, Nazari A, Lurie D. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(4):781-786.