National differences in mindset among students who plan to be teachers

International Journal of School and Educational Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 158-164

  Asbury, Kathryn ^a   Klassen, Robert ^a   Bowyer Crane, Claudine ^a   Kyriacou, Chris ^a   Nash, Poppy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

academic potential; behavior; labeling; mindset; teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042321271     PISSN: 21683603     EISSN: 21683611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21683603.2015.1075164     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahmavaara, A., & Houston, D. M., (2007). The effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents’ academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck's self-theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 613–632.
2. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S., (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
3. Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J., (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.
4. Butler, R., (2000). Making judgements about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 965–978.
5. Butler, R., (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientation and association with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 241–252.
6. Chen, C. S., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W., (1996). Academic achievement and motivation of Chinese students: A cross-national perspective. In S. , Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 69–91). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
7. Chen, W. W., & Wong, Y. L., (2014). Chinese mindset: Theories of intelligence, goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong students. Educational Psychology: An international Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01443410.2014.893559.
8. Clark, M., (1997). Teacher response to learning disability: Testing some attributional principles. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 60, 69–79.
9. Clark, M., & Artiles, A., (2000). A cross-national study of teachers’ attributional patterns. Journal of Special Education, 34, 77–89.
10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M., (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
11. Dresel, M., Fasching, M. S., Steuer, G., Nitsche, S., & Dickhauser, O., (2013). Relations between teachers’ goal orientations, their instructional practices and students’ motivation. Psychology, 4(7), 572–584.
12. Dweck, C. S., (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y., (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.
14. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L., (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
15. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S., (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717.
16. Gutshall, C. A., (2013). Teachers’ mindsets for students with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 1073–1083.
17. Hau, K. T., & Salili, F., (1996). Achievement goals and causal attributions of Chinese students. In S. , Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 121–145). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
18. Ho, I. T., & Hau, K. T., (2008). Academic achievement in the Chinese context: The role of goals, strategies and effort. International Journal of Psychology, 78, 331–353.
19. Leondari, A., & Gialamas, V., (2002). Implicit theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: Impact on students’ achievement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 279–291.
20. Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D., (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 529–545.
21. Osterholm, K., Nash, W., & Kritsonis, W., (2007). Effects of labelling students “learning disabled”: Emergent themes in the research literature 1970 through 2000. Focus on Colleges, Universities and Schools, 1, 1–11.
22. Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C., (2012). It's ok—not everyone can be good at math: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.
23. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68.
24. Sternberg, R., (2000). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. , Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S. Y., Chen, C., Stigler, J. W., Hsu, C. C., Kitamura, S., & Hatano, G., (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–119.
26. Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. H., (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J., (2006). Relation between teachers’ early expectations and students’ later perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 75–86.