Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 31, Issue , 2018, Pages 351-357

  Ghermandi, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042312237     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alfranca, O., García, J., Varela, H., Economic valuation of a created wetland fed with treated wastewater located in a peri-urban park in Catalonia, Spain. Water Sci. Technol. 63:5 (2011), 891–898.
2. Allan, J.D., Smith, S.D.P., McIntyre, P.B., Joseph, C.A., Dickinson, C.E., Marino, A.L., Biel, R.G., Olson, J.C., Doran, P.J., Rutherford, E.S., Adkins, J.E., Adeyemo, A.O., Using cultural ecosystem services to inform restoration priorities in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13:8 (2015), 418–424.
3. Austin, G., Multifunctional wastewater treatment landscapes. Landsc. J. 322 (2013), 67–82.
4. Bojic, I., Massaro, E., Belyi, A., Sobolevsky, S., and Ratti, C., 2015. Choosing the right home location definition method for the given dataset. In: Liu, T.Y., Scollon, C., and Zhu, W. (Eds.). Social Informatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9471. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
5. Brander, L., Bräuer, I., Gerdes, H., Ghermandi, A., Kuik, O., Markandya, A., Navrud, S., Nunes, P., Schaafsma, M., Vos, H., Wagtendonk, A., Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands. Environ. Resour. Econ. 52 (2012), 395–413.
6. CH2M-Hill. 1999. Treatment wetland habitat and wildlife use assessment. USEPA, Office of Water, EPA 832-5-99-001.
7. Creel, M.D., Loomis, J.B., Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 72:2 (1990), 434–441.
8. Elwood, S., Goodchild, M.F., Sui, D.Z., Researching volunteered geographic information: spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geog. 77:1 (2012), 571–590.
9. Englin, J., Shonkwiler, J.S., Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. Rev. Econ. Stat. 77:1 (1995), 104–112.
10. Fezzi, C., Bateman, I.J., Ferrini, S., Using revealed preferences to estimate the value of travel time to recreation sites. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 67:1 (2014), 58–70.
11. Ghermandi, A., Sheela, A.M., Justus, J., Integrating similarity analysis and ecosystem service value transfer: results from a tropical coastal wetland in India. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 73–82.
12. Ghermandi, A., Analysis of intensity and spatial patterns of public use in natural treatment systems using geotagged photos from social media. Water Res. 105 (2016), 297–304.
13. Ghermandi, A., Fichtman, E., Cultural ecosystem services of multifunctional constructed treatment wetlands and waste stabilization ponds: time to enter the mainstream?. Ecol. Eng. 84 (2015), 615–623.
14. Global Wetland Technology, 2016. GWT references 2016. http://www.globalwettech.com/en/references.html. Viewed 2 June 2017.
15. Goodchild, M.F., Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal. 69:4 (2007), 211–221.
16. Gower, J.C., A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27 (1971), 857–871.
17. Graham, D.W., Smith, V.H., Designed ecosystem services: application of ecological principles in wastewater treatment engineering. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:4 (2004), 199–206.
18. Haab, T.C., McConnell, K.E., Single site demand estimation. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources, 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
19. Heikinheimo, V., Di Minin, E., Tenkanen, H., Hausmann, A., Erkkonen, J., Toivonen, T., User-generated geographic information for visitor monitoring in a National Park: a comparison of social media data and visitor survey. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6:85 (2017), 1–14.
20. Heipke, C., Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 65 (2010), 550–557.
21. Hijmans, R., 2012. Database of Global Administrative Areas. Version 2.0. http://www.gadm.org. Viewed 29 May 2017.
22. ILO–International Labour Office, Global wage report 2016/17: wage inequalities in the workplace. 2016, ILO, Geneva.
23. IMF–International Monetary Fund, 2017. GDP per capita, current prices. http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PPPPC@WEO/THA. Viewed 12 December 2017.
24. Kadlec, R.H., Wallace, S., Treatment Wetlands. second ed., 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
25. Keeler, B.L., Wood, S.A., Polasky, S., Kling, C., Filstrup, C.T., Downing, J.A., Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13:2 (2015), 76–81.
26. Knight, R.L., Ancillary benefits and potential problems with the use of wetlands for nonpoint source pollution control. Ecol. Eng. 1:1–2 (1992), 97–113.
27. Knight, R.L., Wildlife habitat and public use benefits of treatment wetlands. Water Sci. Technol. 35:5 (1997), 35–43.
28. Li, L., Goodchild, M.F., Xu, B., Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 40:2 (2013), 61–77.
29. Lovell, S.T., Johnston, D.M., Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:4 (2009), 212–220.
30. Luthy, R.G., Sedlak, D.L., Plumlee, M.H., Austin, D., Resh, V.H., Wastewater-effluent-dominated streams as ecosystem-management tools in a drier climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13:9 (2015), 477–485.
31. Malaysia Department of Statistics, Report of household income and basic amenities survey 2014. 2015, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
32. McConnell, K.E. and Strand, I.E., 1994. The economic value of Mid and South Atlantic sportfishing. Report to USEPA and NOAA. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland.
33. Parsons, G.R., Kealy, M.J., Randomly drawn opportunity sets in a random utility model of lake recreation. Land Econ. 68:1 (1992), 93–106.
34. Parsons, G.R., The travel cost model. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., Brown, T.C., (eds.) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, 2003, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
35. Podani, J., Extending Gower's general coefficient of similarity to ordinal characters. Taxon 48 (1999), 331–340.
36. Rieser-Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K.W., Self-tracing and reporting: state of the art in the capture of revealed behaviour. Hess, S., Daly, A., (eds.) Handbook of Choice Modelling, 2014, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
37. Sessions, C., Wood, S.A., Rabotyagov, S., Fisher, D.M., Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowd-sourced photographs. J. Environ. Manage. 183:3 (2016), 703–711.
38. Singleton, A., Neogeography: engaging people for common good. GIS Dev. 14:2 (2010), 26–29.
39. Sonter, L.J., Watson, K.B., Wood, S.A., Ricketts, T.H., Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of nature-based recreation, estimated via social media. PLoS One, 11(9), 2016, e0162372.
40. The World Bank, World Development Indicators. 2017, The World Bank, Washington DC.
41. US Census Bureau, 2016. 2015 Poverty and Median Household Income Estimates – Counties, States, and National. Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) Program.
42. Wang, Y., Neupane, A., Vickers, A., Klavins, T., Bewer, R., Ecosystem Services Approach Pilot on Wetlands: Economic Valuation Technical Report. 2011, Alberta Government, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
43. Willemen, L., Cottam, A.J., Drakou, E.G., Burgess, N.D., Using social media to measure the contribution or Red List species to the nature-based tourism potential of African protected areas. PLoS One, 10(6), 2015, e0129785.
44. Wood, S.A., Guerry, A.D., Silver, J.M., Lacayo, M., Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013), 1–7.
45. Zielstra, D., Hochmair, H.H., Positional accuracy analysis of Flickr and Panoramio images for selected world regions. J. Spat. Sci. 58:2 (2013), 251–273.