From top-down land use planning intelligence to bottom-up stakeholder engagement for smart cities – A case study: DECUMANUS service products

International Journal of Services, Technology and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 5-6, 2017, Pages 465-493

  Ludlow, David ^a   Khan, Zaheer ^a   Soomro, Kamran ^a   Marconcini, Mattia ^b   José, Roberto San ^c   Malcorps, Philippe ^d   Lemper, Maria ^e   Perez, Juan Luis ^c   Metz, Annekatrin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d Bervierslaan 54   (Belgium)

^e GeoVille GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bottom up stakeholder participation; Co creation; Earth observation data; Innovation; Top down integrated urban governance

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; OBSERVATORIES; SMART CITY; URBAN PLANNING;

CO-CREATION; EARTH OBSERVATION DATA; INTEGRATED URBAN PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY SENSING; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; URBAN GOVERNANCE;

LAND USE;

EID: 85042304985     PISSN: 14606720     EISSN: 1741525X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJSTM.2017.10009861     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bunt, L. and Harris, M. (2010) Mass Localism: A Way To Help Small Communities Solve Big Social Challenges, NESTA Discussion Paper [online] https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/mass_localism.pdf (accessed 27 January 2017)..
2. Chua, B. and Dyson, L. (2004) ‘Applying the ISO 9126 model to the evaluation of an e-learning system’, Proc. of ASCILITE, pp.5–8.
3. Copernicus (2016) EU Earth Observation Programme [online] http://www.copernicus.eu/ (accessed 27 January 2017).
4. Davies, S., Selin, C., Gano, G. and Pereira, G. (2012) ‘Citizen engagement and urban change: three case studies of material deliberation’, Cities Elsevier Journal, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp.351–357.
5. DECUMANUS Project (2013) [online] http://www.decumanus-fp7.eu (accessed 27 January 2017).
6. DECUMANUS Project (2014) User Requirements Definition (I), Deliverable 2.1, February/March.
7. Eckhardt, F. and Elander, I. (Eds.) (2011) Urban Governance in Europe, BWV-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-8305-1502-9.
8. European Commission (2013a) A Vision for Public Services, DG-CNCT, Published 13/06/2013.
9. European Commission (2013b) Powering European Public Sector Innovation: Towrds A New Architecture, Expert Report, EUR 13825 EN.
10. European Commission (2013c) Thematic Issue: Ecosystem-based Adaptation, No. 37.
11. EXPGOV Project (2009) Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European Cities, Deliverable D.1 – Final Version.
12. Hanzl, M. (2007) ‘Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials’, Design Studies, May, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.289–307.
13. Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2004) ‘Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century’, Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.419–436.
14. Insight Project (2013) Policy Modelling and Governance Tools for Sustainable Urban Development – State of the art and Future Challenges [online] http://www.nommonfiles.es/working_papers/INSIGHT_PositionPaper_Oct2013.pdf (accessed 27 January 2017).
15. Jacquier, C. (2008) ‘Urban governance: forging a path between complications and complexity’, Reims Symposium “Towards New Territorial Governance”.
16. Kahila, M. and Kyttä, M. (2010) ‘SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning’, Journal of Planning Support Systems – Best Practice and New Methods, Vol. 95, No. 19, pp.389–411, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
17. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D. and Caceres, S. (2013a) ‘Evaluating a collaborative IT based research and development project’, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 40, pp.27–41.
18. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D. and Loibl, W. (2013b) ‘Applying the CoReS requirements development method for building IT tools for urban management systems: the UrbanAPI project’, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.25–59.
19. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D., Loibl, W. and Soomro, K. (2014) ‘ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development: the UrbanAPI project’, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.205–229.
20. Kingston, R. (2007) ‘Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping’, The Cartographic Journal, ICA Special Issue, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp.138–144.
21. Kyttä, M. (2011) ‘The inhabitant friendly, health promoting urban structure’, Conference Proceedings, Open Space: People Space 3, Edinburgh. pp.11–18.
22. Lang, V. and Sittler, P. (2012) ‘Augmented reality for real estate’, Proceedings, 18th Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Adelaide.
23. Lew, P., Olsina, L. and Zhang, L. (2010) Web Engineering: 10th International Conference, ICWE 2010, Vienna Austria, 5–9 July 2010, pp.218–232, in Benatallah, B. et al. (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
24. Misuraca, G. et al. (2010) Envisioning Digital Europe 2030: Scenarios for ICT in Future Govenance and Policy Modelling, in Misuraca, G. and Lusoli, W. (Eds.), JRC Report, EUR 24614 EN – 2010.
25. Poplin, A. (2011) ‘Playful public participation in urban planning: a case study for online serious games’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp.195–206.
26. Rowe, G. and Fewer, L. (2000) ‘Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, Winter, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.3–29.
27. Rowe, G. and Fewer, L. (2005) ‘A typology of public engagement mechanisms’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, Spring, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.251–290.
28. Silva, C. (2010) Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring, pp.1–546, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.
29. Taylor, N. (2007) Urban Planning Theory Since 1945, London, Sage.
30. United Nations (2010) Shanghai Manual – A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development of the 21st Century, World Expo 2010 Shanghai, China [online] http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/susdevtopics/sdt_humasett_capacitybuilding.shtml (accessed 27 January 2017).
31. Wampler, B. and McNulty, S. (2011) Does Participatory Governance Matter? Exploring the Nature and Impact of Participatory Reforms, Comparative Urban Studies Project [online] http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/does-participatory-governance-matter (accessed 27 January 2017).
32. Wong, C. (2011) ‘Decision-making and problem-solving’, in Hull, A. Alexander E.R., Khakee, A. and Woltjer, J. (Eds.): Evaluation for Participation and Sustainability in Planning, Routledge, UK.
33. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K. and Baum, S. (2008) Creative Urban Regions: Harnessing Urban Technologies to Support Knowledge City Initiatives, pp.1–390, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-838-3.