Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “slowly digestible starch in starch-containing foods” and “reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses” pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

EFSA Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

digestible starch; glucose; health claim; post prandial; rapidly; responses; Slowly

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042177496     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2292     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berti C, Riso P, Monti LD and Porrini M, 2004. In vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glucose response of gluten-free foods and their gluten counterparts. European Journal of Nutrition, 43, 198–204.
2. Brand-Miller JC, Holt S, Atkinson F, Fuzellier G and Agnetti V, 2006, unpublished. Determination of the postprandial responses to two cereal foods eaten alone or as part of a mixed meal.
3. Brighenti F, Pellegrini N, Casiraghi MC and Testolin G, 1995. In vitro studies to predict physiological effects of dietary fibre. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49 Suppl 3, S81–88.
4. Englyst HN, Veenstra J and Hudson GJ, 1996. Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response. British Journal of Nutrition, 75, 327–337.
5. Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ and Cummings JH, 1999. Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 448–454.
6. Giacco R, Brighenti F, Parillo M, Capuano M, Ciardullo AV, Rivieccio A, Rivellese AA and Riccardi G, 2001. Characteristics of some wheat-based foods of the Italian diet in relation to their influence on postprandial glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. British Journal of Nutrition, 85, 33–40.
7. Granfeldt Y, Bjorck I, Drews A and Tovar J, 1992. An in vitro procedure based on chewing to predict metabolic response to starch in cereal and legume products. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 649–660.
8. Holm J and Bjorck I, 1992. Bioavailability of starch in various wheat-based bread products: evaluation of metabolic responses in healthy subjects and rate and extent of in vitro starch digestion. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55, 420–429.
9. Laville M, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Normand S and Braesco V, 2005, unpublished. Measurement of metabolic outcome of carbohydrates of two types pf cereal products.
10. Nazare JA, de Rougemont A, Normand S, Sauvinet V, Sothier M, Vinoy S, Desage M and Laville M, 2009. Effect of postprandial modulation of glucose availability: short- and long-term analysis. British Journal of Nutrition, 103, 1461–1470.
11. Rabasa-Lhoret R, Peronnet F, Jannot C, Fuzellier G and Gausseres N, 2007, unpublished. Metabolic fate of four cereal products consumed as part of a breakfast by healthy female subjects.
12. Seal CJ, Daly ME, Thomas LC, Bal W, Birkett AM, Jeffcoat R and Mathers JC, 2003. Postprandial carbohydrate metabolism in healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes fed starches with slow and rapid hydrolysis rates determined in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition, 90, 853–864.
13. Venn BJ and Green TJ, 2007. Glycemic index and glycemic load: measurement issues and their effect on diet-disease relationships. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61 Suppl 1, S122–131.
14. Vinoy S, Aubert R and Chapelot D, 2000, unpublished. A cereal product high in slowly availalble glucose increases subsequent satiety feelings and decreases glucose and insulin responses.
15. Woolnough JW, Monro JA, Brennan CS and Bird AR, 2008. Simulating human carbohydrate digestion in vitro: a review of methods and the need for standardisation. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 43, 2245–2256.