The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox

Urban Studies

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 679-701

  Kong, Lily ^a   Woods, Orlando ^a  

^a SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

governance; Singapore, smart nation, smart urbanism; urban futures; urban infrastructures

Indexed keywords

CITIZENSHIP; FUTURE PROSPECT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IDEOLOGY; INFRASTRUCTURE; SMART CITY; URBAN AREA; URBAN POLITICS; URBANIZATION;

SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA];

EID: 85042148815     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098017746528     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alizadeh T, Sipe N, Dodson J, (2014) Spatial planning and high-speed broadband: Australia’s national broadband network and metropolitan planning. International Planning Studies 19(3–4): 359–378.
2. AlSayyad N, Guvenc M, (2015) Virtual uprisings: On the interaction of new social media, traditional media coverage and urban space during the ‘Arab Spring’. Urban Studies 52(11): 2018–2034.
3. Andrejevic M, (2005) Nothing comes between me and my CPU: Smart clothes and ‘ubiquitous’ computing. Theory, Culture & Society 22(3): 101–119.
4. Aradau C, (2015) The signature of security: Big data, anticipation, surveillance. Radical Philosophy 191: 21–28.
5. Ash J, Kitchin R, Leszczynski A, (2018) Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography 42(1):
6. Barns S, Cosgrave E, Acuto M. (2017) Digital infrastructures and urban governance. Urban Policy and Research 35(1): 20–31.
7. Chua BH, (2011) Singapore as model: Planning innovations, knowledge experts. In: Roy A, Ong A, (eds) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 29–54.
8. Datta A, (2015) New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography 5: 3–22.
9. Deleuze G, (1992) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7.
10. Dodge M, Kitchin R, (2005) Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95: 323–341.
11. Farías I, Blok A, (2016) Technical democracy as a challenge to urban studies. City 20(4): 539–548.
12. Firmino R, Duarte F, (2016) Private video monitoring of public spaces: The construction of new invisible territories. Urban Studies 53(4): 741–754.
13. Foo SL, Pan G, (2016) Singapore’s vision of a smart nation: Thinking big, starting small and scaling fast. Asian Management Insights 3: 77–82.
14. Foucault M, (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Vintage Books.
15. Foucault M, (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, (eds) The Foucault Effect: Stuides in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.
16. Franklin S, (2015) Control: Digitality as Cultural Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Giles JR, (2006) The Spaces of Violence. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
18. GovTech (2017) Formation of the Smart Nation and Digital Government Group in the Prime Minister’s office. Available at: https://www.tech.gov.sg/Media-Room/MediaReleases/2017/03/Formation-of-the-Smart-Nation-and-Digital-Government-Group-inthe-Prime-Ministers-office (accessed 25 October 2017).
19. Graham S, Marvin S, (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. New York: Routledge.
20. Greenfield A, (2006) Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Boston, MA: New Riders.
21. Greenfield A, (2013) Against the Smart City. New York: Do Publications.
22. Halpern O, LeCavalier L, Calvillo N. (2014) Test-bed urbanism. Public Culture 25: 273–306.
23. Hatuka T, Toch E, (2017) Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility. Urban Studies 54(4): 984–998.
24. Heng J, (2016) Smart cities, smoother lives. In: Disruption: What Lies Ahead. Singapore: Straits Times Press, pp. 7–14.
25. Ho P, (2017a) Governing in the Anthropocene: Risk & resilience, imagination & innovation. Institute of Policy Studies-SR Nathan Lecture, 19 April 2017, Singapore. Available at: http://lkyspp2.nus.edu.sg/ips/event/201617-ips-nathan-lectures-lecture-ii-governance-in-the-anthropocene-risk-resilience-imagination-innovation (accessed 1 December 2017).
26. Ho E, (2017b) Smart subjects for a Smart Nation? Governing (smart)mentalities in Singapore. Urban Studies 54(13): 3101–3118
27. Hollands RG, (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12: 303–320.
28. Housing and Development Board (HDB) (2016) Dwellings. Issue 3.
29. Kitchin R, (2011) Commentary: The programmable city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 945–951.
30. Kitchin R, (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79: 1–14.
31. Kitchin R, (2015) Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 131–136.
32. Lefebvre H, (1968) Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
33. Leszczynski A, (2016) Specualtive futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A 48(9): 1691–1708.
34. Luque-Ayala A, Marvin S, (2015) Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies 52(12): 2105–2116.
35. Luque-Ayala A, McFarlane C, Marvin S, (2014) Smart urbanism: Cities, grids and alternatives? In: Hodson M, Marvin S, (eds) After Sustainable Cities? London: Routledge, pp. 74–90.
36. McFarlane C, (2016) The geographies of urban density: Topology, politics and the city. Progress in Human Geography 40(5): 629–648.
37. McLean A, Bulkeley H, Crang M, (2016) Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio technical experimentation in the city of Austin. Urban Studies 53(15): 3246–3263.
38. Morozov E, (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. New York: Allen Lane.
39. Olds K, Yeung HW-C, (2004) Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy 11(3): 489–521.
40. Purcell M, (2017) The city is ours (if we decide it is). In: Shaw J, Graham M, (eds) Our Digital Rights to the City. Meatspace Press, pp. 30–33. Available at: https://meatspacepress.org/our-digital-rights-to-the-city/ (accessed 1 December 2017).
41. Radcliffe SA, (2017) Decolonising geographical knowledges. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42: 329–333.
42. Reitzes DC, Parker J, Crimmins T. (2016) Digital communications among homeless people: Anomaly or necessity? The Journal of the Urban Affairs Association, DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12310.
43. Rose G, (2017) Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(4): 779–793.
44. Shatkin G, (2014) Reinterpreting the meaning of the ‘Singapore model’: State capitalism and urban planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1): 116–137.
45. Shelton T, Zook M, Wiig A, (2015) The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 13–25.
46. Smart Nation Singapore (2017) Enablers. Available at: https://www.smartnation.sg/about-smartnation/enablers (accessed 26 July 2017).
47. Soja EW, (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
48. Soja EW, (1999) In different spaces: The cultural turn in regional and urban political economy. European Planning Studies 7(1): 65–75.
49. Spiller K, (2016) Experiences of accessing CCTV data: The urban topologies of subject access requests. Urban Studies 53(13): 2885–2900.
50. Sui D, (1997) Reconstructing urban reality: From GIS to electropolis. Urban Geography 18(1): 74–89.
51. Swynegdouw E, (2007) Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In: Krueger R, Gibbs D, (eds) The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 13–40.
52. Taylor Buck N, While A, (2017) Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative. Urban Studies 54(2): 501–519.
53. Tham I, (2016) And next, a mobile digital ID? In: Disruption: What Lies Ahead. Singapore: Straits Times Press, pp. 77–84.
54. The Straits Times (2017) Untangling the way to a Smart Nation. Available at: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/untangling-the-way-to-a-smart-nation (accessed 10 April 2017).
55. The Sunday Times (2016) Developing key capabilities is key to staying relevant. 13 November, p. B5.
56. Thrift N, (2009) Space: The fundamental stuff of human geography. In: Hollaway SL, Rice SP, Valentine G, (eds) Key Concepts in Geography. London: Sage, pp. 95–107.
57. Vaast E, Walsham G, (2009) Trans-situated learning: Supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure. Information Systems Research 20(4): 547–564.
58. Vanolo A, (2014) Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51(5): 883–898.
59. Viitanen JKR, (2013) Smart cities and green growth: Outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environment and Planning A 46(4): 803–819.
60. Vuolteenaho J, Leurs K, Sumiala J, (2015) Digital urbanisms: Exploring the spectacular, ordinary and contested facets of the media city. Observtorio (OBS*) 9: 1–21.
61. Wiig A, Wyly E, (2016) Introduction: Thinking through the politics of the smart city. Urban Geography 37(4): 485–493.
62. Wilson MW, (2011) Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 857–872.
63. Woods O, Kong L, (2017) Mobile cities, modelling policies: Importing/exporting the Singapore ‘model’ of development. In: Short JR, (ed.) A Research Agenda for Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 206–217.