Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 323-335

  Willems, S J W ^a   Schat, A ^b   van Noorden, M S ^b   Fiocco, M ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dependent censoring; informative censoring; inverse probability censoring weighted estimator; inverse probability weighting; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MONITORING; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BIOSTATISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; BIAS; BIOSTATISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SAMPLE SIZE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85041956201     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280216628900     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Recovery of information and adjustment for dependent censoring using surrogate markers. In: Jewell NP, Dietz K, Farewell VT, (eds). AIDS Epidemiology, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1992, pp. 297–331.
2. Robins JM. Information recovery and bias adjustment in proportional hazards regression analysis of randomized trials using surrogate markers. In: Proceedings of the biopharmaceutical section, Virginia: American Statistical Association, 1993, pp.24–33
3. Robins JM, Finkelstein DM. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an aids clinical trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics 2000; 56: 779–788.
4. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.
5. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis: a self-learning text (statistics for biology and health), 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2012.
6. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
7. Therneau TM. A package for survival analysis in S, 2013. R package version 2.37-4, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival (accessed 13 January 2016)
8. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model, New York, NY: Springer, 2000.
9. Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiat 1979; 134: 382–389.
10. de Beurs E, den Hollander-Gijsman ME, van Rood YR, et al. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother 2011; 18(1): 1–12
11. Mooney CZ. Monte Carlo Simulation (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-116), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
12. Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med 2005; 24(11): 1713–1723.
13. Chang IM, Gelman R, Pagano M. Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statistics. J Chronic Dis 1982; 35: 669–674.