Bilateral versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafts for coronary arterial atherosclerosis

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2018, Issue 2, 2018, Pages

  Taggart, David P ^a   D'amico, Roberto ^b   Mussa, Shafi ^c   Altman, Douglas G ^d   Moore, Theresa H M ^e   Burke, Margaret ^e  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^c PAPWORTH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETRACTED ARTICLE;

EID: 85041665074     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004475.pub2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ISRCTN. Arterial Revascularisation Trial - A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting in coronary revascularisation. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN46552265. Accessed January 30th 2007 2007.
2. Berreklouw E, Schonberger JP, Ercan H, Koldewijn EL, de Bock M, Verwaal VJ, et al. Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries?. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1456-63.
3. Buxton BF, Komeda M, Fuller JA, Gordon I. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery. Risk-adjusted survival. Circulation 1998;98:II-1-II-6.
4. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, Di Mauro M, Mazzei V, Teodori G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 2000;120:990-8.
5. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, SchaffHV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15-year period. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;334:216-9.
6. Anon. Complete Arterial Revascularization and Conventional Coronary Artery Surgery. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00317265?order=1 Accessed January 30 2007 2007.
7. Clarke M, Oxman AD editors. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.1.3 [Updated June 2001]. The Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001.
8. Dewar LR, Jamieson WR, Janusz MT, Adeli-Sardo M, Germann E, MacNab JS, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance. Circulation 1995;92 [Suppl II]:II-8-II -13.
9. Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, Verhelst R, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G, et al. Long-term and angiographic follow up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2000;17:407-14.
10. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, DavidoffR, Ewy GA, Fonger J, Gardner TJ, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Gidelines. (Committee to revise the 1991 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Circulation 1999;100:1464-80.
11. Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2001;104:2164-70.
12. Farinas JM, Carrier M, Hebert Y, Cartier R, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, et al. Comparison of long-term clinical results of double versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1999;67:466-70.
13. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HB, Leach HA, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5, 065 grafts related to survival in reoperation in 1, 388 patients during 25 years. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1996;28:616-26.
14. Ioannidis JPA, Galanos O, Katritsis D, Connery CP, Drossos GE, Swistel DG, et al. Early mortality and morbidity of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery revascularization: propensity and risk modeling. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2001;37(2):521-8.
15. Johnson WD, Brenowitz JB, Kayser KL. Factors influencing long-term (10-year to 15-year) survival after a successful coronary artery bypass operation. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1989;48:19-25.
16. Kaul TK, Fields BL, Wyatt DA, Jones CR, Kahn DR. Reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery: early and late results and management in 1300 patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1995;36:303-12.
17. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. New England Journal of Medicine 1986;314:1-6.
18. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 1999;117:855-72.
19. Morris JJ, Smith R, Glower DD, Muhlbaier LH, Reves JG, Wechsler AS, et al. Clinical evaluation of single versus multiple mammary artery bypass. Circulation 1990;82 (suppl IV):IV-214-IV-223.
20. Naunheim KS, Barner HB, Fiore AC. Update (1990: Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1992;53:716-8.
21. Parmar MKB, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998;17:2815-34.
22. Pawlaczyk R. Siondalski P. Roszak K. Rogowski J. Devyatko E. Simon P. Surgical treatment of coronary artery disease - Complete arterial revascularization or single arterial and additional venous grafts?. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny 2006;78(8):889-896.
23. Pawlaczyk R. Siondalski P. Roszak K. Laskawski G. Los A. Brzezinski M. Ciecwierz D. Devyatko E. Simon P. Rogowski J. Results of early angiographic evaluation in operated patients with coronary disease - Polish group of the CARACCASS trial. Folia Cardiologica 2006;13(1):53-9.
24. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, SchaffHV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1997;64:599-605.
25. Rizzoli G, Schiavon L, Bellini P. Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to use of a single IMA graft? A metanalysis approach. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2002;22:781-6.
26. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Validation and interdependence with patient-variables of the influence of procedural variables on early and late survival after CABG. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1997;12:1-19.
27. Taggart DP, Lees B, Gray A, Altman DG, Flather M, Channon K, the ART Investigators. Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularisation [ISRCTN46552265]. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1450314 2006. [DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-7-7]
28. Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA. Frequency of repeat coronary bypass or coronary angioplasty after coronary artery bypass surgery using saphenous vein grafts. American Journal of Cardiology 1994;73:103-12.
29. Wells G. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Paper presented at 3rd Symposium on 'Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics. Oxford, 2000.
30. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70.
31. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358(9285):870-5.