New methods for modelling EQ-5D-5L value sets: An application to English data

Health Economics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 23-38

  Feng, Yan ^a   Devlin, Nancy J ^a,b   Shah, Koonal K ^a   Mulhern, Brendan ^b,c   van Hout, Ben ^b  

^a Office of Health Economics   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

econometric modelling; EQ 5D 5L; health utilities; health related quality of life; value set

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; ENGLAND; HEALTH STATUS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85041422013     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: 10991050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3560     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Augustovski, F., Rey-Ares, L., Irazola, V., Garay, O. U., Gianneo, O., Fernández, G., … Ramos-Goñi, J. M. (2016). An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences. Quality of Life Research, 25(2), 323–333.
2. Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J. A., & Tsuchiya, A. (2017). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation (Second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Burström, K., Sun, S., Gerdtham, U. G., Henriksson, M., Johannesson, M., Levin, L. Å., & Zethraeus, N. (2014). Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states. Quality of Life Research, 23(2), 431–432.
4. Devlin, N., Buckingham, K., Shah, K. K., Tsuchiya, A., Tilling, C., Wilkinson, G., & van Hout, B. (2013). A comparison of alternative variants of the lead and lag time TTO. Health Economics, 22(5), 517–532.
5. Devlin, N., Hansen, P., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (2003). Logical inconsistencies in survey respondents' health state valuations—A methodological challenge for estimating social tariffs. Health Economics, 12(7), 529–544.
6. Devlin, N., & Krabbe, P. (2013). The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L. European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), S1–S3.
7. Devlin, N., Shah, K. K., & Buckingham, K. (2017). What is the normative basis for selecting the measure of ‘average’ preferences to use in social choices? OHE Research Paper. London: Office of Health Economics.
8. Devlin, N. J., Shah, K. K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., & van Hout, B. (2017). Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Economics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564
9. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.
10. Engel, L., Bansback, N., Bryan, S., Doyle-Waters, M. M., & Whitehurst, D. G. (2016). Exclusion criteria in national health state valuation studies: A systematic review. Medical Decision Making, 36(7), 798–810.
11. Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M. F., Kind, P., Parkin, D., … Badia, X. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727–1736.
12. Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, I., Noto, S., Fukuda, T., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2015). Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 64(1), 47–55.
13. Janssen, B., Oppe, M., Versteegh, M., & Stolk, E. (2013). Introducing the composite TTO: A test of feasibility and face validity. European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), 5–13.
14. Kim, S. H., Ahn, J., Ock, M., Shin, S., Park, J., Luo, N., & Jo, M. W. (2016). The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea. Quality of Life Research, 25(7), 1845–1852.
15. Leidl, R., & Reitmeir, P. (2011). A value set for the EQ-5D based on experienced health states: Development and testing for the German population. PharmacoEconomics, 29(6), 521–534.
16. Luo, N., Wang, Y., How, C. H., Tay, E. G., Thumboo, J., & Herdman, M. (2015). Interpretation and use of the 5-level EQ-5D response labels varied with survey language among Asians in Singapore. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(10), 1195–1204.
17. th December 2016.
18. Oppe, M., Devlin, N. J., van Hout, B., Krabbe, P. F., & de Charro, F. (2014). A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value in Health, 17(4), 445–453.
19. Oppe, M., & van Hout, B. (2010). The optimal hybrid: experimental design and modeling of a combination of TTO and DCE. In J. Yfantopoulos (Ed.), 27th Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group—Proceedings. Rotterdam: EuroQol Group Executive Office.
20. Rowen, D., Brazier, J., & van Hout, B. (2014). A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale. Medical Decision Making, 35(3), 328–340.
21. van Busschbach, J., McDonnell, J., Essink-Bot, M. L., & van Hout, B. (1999). Estimating parametric relationships between health description and health valuation with an application to the EuroQol EQ-5D. Journal of Health Economics, 18(5), 551–571.
22. th EuroQol Scientific Plenary. Lund, Sweden. 17–18 October.
23. Versteegh, M. M., Vermeulen, K. M., Evers, S. M., de Wit, G. A., Prenger, R., & Stolk, E. A. (2016). Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D. Value in Health, 19(4), 343–352.
24. Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Gaebel, K., Bansback, N., Bryan, S., Ohinmaa, A., … Johnson, J. A. (2016). Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study group. A time trade-off derived value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Medical Care, 54(1), 98–105.