QSAR analysis of the toxicity of phenols and thiophenols using MLR and ANN

Journal of Taibah University for Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-10

  Ghamali, Mounir ^a   Chtita, Samir ^a   Ousaa, Abdellah ^a   Elidrissi, Bouhya ^a   Bouachrine, Mohammed ^b   Lakhlifi, Tahar ^a  

^a MOULAY ISMAIL UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^b MOULAY ISMAIL UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Phenols; Photobacterium phosphoreum; QSAR; Thiophenols

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041405740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16583655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. X.LiZ.WangH.LiuH.YuQuantitative structure–activity relationship for prediction of the toxicity of phenols on Photobacterium phosphoreumBull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.8920122731
2. M.G.PaulinoM.M.SakuraguiM.N.FernandesEffects of atrazine on the gill cells and ionic balance in a neotropical fish, Prochilodus lineatusChemosphere86201217
3. K.RoyS.KarR.N.DasUnderstanding the Basics of QSAR for Applications in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Risk Assessment2015Academic Press
4. K.RoyS.KarR.N.DasA Primer on QSAR/QSPR Modeling: Fundamental Concepts (Springer Briefs in Molecular Science)2015Springer
5. J.C.DeardenThe history and development of quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs)Int. J. Quant. Struct.-Prop. Relationsh.112016144
6. J.D.McKinneyA.RichardC.WallerM.C.NewmanF.GerberikThe practice of structure activity relationships (SAR) in toxicologyToxicol. Sci.5620008
7. H.YuX.LiZ.WangH.LiuQuantitative structure–activity relationship for prediction of the toxicity of phenols on Photobacterium phosphoreumBull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.8920122731
8. M.Asadollahi-BaboliExploring QSTR analysis of the toxicity of phenols and thiophenols using machine learning methodsEnviron. Toxicol. Pharmacol.342012826831
9. L.M.SuY.H.ZhaoX.YuanC.F.MuN.WangJ.C.YanEvaluation of combined toxicity of phenols and lead to Photobacterium phosphoreum and quantitative structure–activity relationshipsBull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.842010311314
10. M.J.FrischGaussian 03, Revision B.012003Gaussian, Inc.Pittsburgh, PA
11. U.SakarR.ParthasarathiV.SubramanianP.K.ChattarajiToxicity analysis of polychlorinated dibenzofurans through globalJ. Mol. Des. IECMD2004124
12. Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Toronto, Canada, 2009, www.acdlabs.com/resources/freeware/chemsketch/.
13. M.LarifA.AdadR.HmammouchiA.I.TaghkiA.SoulaymaniA.ElmidaouiM.BouachrineT.Lakhlifi Biological activities of triazine derivatives combining DFT and QSAR resultsArab. J. Chem.201510.1016/j.arabjc.2012.12.033(in press)
14. XLSTAT 2013 software (XLSTAT Company), http://www.xlstat.com.
15. S.ChtitaM.LarifM.GhamaliM.BouachrineT.LakhlifiDFT-based QSAR studies of MK801 derivatives for non competitive antagonists of NMDA using electronic and topological descriptorsJ. Taibah Univ. Chem.922014143154
16. A.AdadM.LarifR.HmamouchiM.BouachrineT.LakhlifiJ. Comp. Meth. Mol. Des.4320147283
17. R.HmamouchiM.LarifA.AdadM.BouachrineT.LakhlifiJ. Comp. Meth. Mol. Des.4320146171
18. D.CherqaouiD.VilleminJ. Chem. Soc., Faraday. Trans.90199497102
19. J.A.FreemanD.M.SkapuraNeural Networks. Algorithms, Applications, and Programming Techniques1991Addison-WesleyReading, MA
20. 2J. Mol. Graphics Model.202002269276
21. P.P.RoyK.RoyQSAR Comb. Sci.272008302
22. STATITCF Software1987Technical Institute of Cereals and FodderParis, France
23. A.OusaaB.ElidrissiM.GhamaliS.ChtitaM.BouachrineT.LakhlifiJ. Comp. Meth. Mol. Des.4320141018