Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Glasgow, Russell E ^a   Estabrooks, Paul E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY CARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85041187279     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170271     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89(9):1322-7.
2. Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann Behav Med 2005;29(2,Suppl):66-75.
3. Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, King DK. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med 2006;30(1):67-73.
4. Finlayson M, Cattaneo D, Cameron M, Coote S, Matsuda PN, Peterson E, et al. Applying the RE-AIM framework to inform the development of a multiple sclerosis falls-prevention intervention. Int J MS Care 2014;16(4):192-7.
5. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof 2013;36(1):44-66.
6. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health 2013;103(6):e38-46.
7. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004;82(4):581-629.
8. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4(1):50.
9. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. California City (CA): Mayfield Publishing Company; 2005.
10. Burke SM, Shapiro S, Petrella RJ, Irwin JD, Jackman M, Pearson ES, et al. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a community-based summer camp for children with obesity: a prospective feasibility study. BMC Obes 2015;2(1):21.
11. Rogers EM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav 2002;27(6):989-93.
12. Banke-Thomas AO, Madaj B, Charles A, van den Broek N. Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2015;15(1):582.
13. Luke DA, Calhoun A, Robichaux CB, Elliott MB, Moreland-Russell S. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: a new instrument for public health programs. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130184.
14. Harden SM, Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Kinney KA, Johnson SB, Brito F, et al. Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2015;4(1):155.
15. Estabrooks PA, Allen KC. Updating, employing, and adapting: a commentary on What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model. Eval Health Prof 2013;36(1):67-72.
16. Estabrooks PA, Wilson KE, McGuire TJ, Harden SM, Ramalingam N, Schoepke L, et al. A quasi-experiment to assess the impact of a scalable, community-based weight loss program: combining reach, effectiveness, and cost. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32(S1,Suppl 1):24-31.
17. Brennan LK, Brownson RC, Hovmand P. Evaluation of Active Living by Design: implementation patterns across communities. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(5,Suppl 4):S351-66.