Exploring the use of linguistic features in domain and genre classification

9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 142-149

  Wolters, Maria ^a   Kirsten, Mathias ^b  

^a Inst f Kommunikationsforschung u Phonetik   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); TEXT PROCESSING;

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; GENRE CLASSIFICATION; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; PART OF SPEECH; TEXT CATEGORIZATION;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85041135836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. Albert. 1991. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6:37-66.
2. H. Bergenholtz and J. Mugdan. 1989. Zur Korpusproblematik in der Computerlinguistik. In I. Batori, W. Lenders, and W. Putschke, editors, Handbuch Computerlinguistik. deGruyter, Berlin/New York.
3. B. Beutel. 1998. Malaga User Manual. http://www.linguistik.unierlangen.de/Malaga.de.html.
4. D. Biber. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. U. Bohnebeck, T. Horvath, and S. Wrobel. 1998. Term comparisons in first-order similarity measures. In Proc. 8th Intl. Conf. Ind. Logic Progr., pages 65-79.
6. W. Daelemans, A. van den Bosch, and T. Weijters. 1997. IGTtree: Using trees for compression and classification in lazy learning algorithms. AI Review, 11:407-423.
7. W. Emde and D. Wettschereck. 1996. Relational instance based learning. In Proc. 13th Intl. Conf. Machine Learning, pages 122-130.
8. R.I. Forsyth and D. Holmes. 1996. Feature-finding for text classification. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11:163-174.
9. R. Glas. 1975. Das LIMAS-Korpus, ein Textkorpus fur die deutsche Gegenwartssprache. Lingustische Berichte, 40:63-66.
10. G. Herdan. 1960. Type-token mathematics: a textbook of mathematical linguistics. Mouton, The Hague.
11. D. Holmes. 1998. The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarschip. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13:111-117.
12. T. Joachims. 1998. Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features. Technical Report LS-8 23, Dept. of Computer Science, Dortmund University.
13. J. Karlgren and D. Cutting. 1994. Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proc. COLING Kyoto.
14. B. Kessler, G. Nunberg, and H. Schiitze. 1997. Automatic classification of text genre. In Proc. 35th ACL/8th EACL Madrid, pages 32-38.
15. J. Klavans and Min-Yen Kan. 1998. Role of verbs in document analysis. In Proc. COLING'/ACL Montreal.
16. T. Kohonen, J. Kangas, J. Laaksonen, and K. Torkkola. 1996. LVQ-PAK - the learning vector quantization package v. 3.0. Technical Report A30, Helsinki University of Technology.
17. I. Kononenko. 1994. Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of relief. In Proc. 7th Europ. Conf. Machine Learning, pages 171 - 182.
18. H. Kucera and W Francis. 1967. Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
19. D. Lewis. 1992. Feature selection and feature extraction for text categorization. In Proc. Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 212-217. Morgan Kaufman.
20. C. Martindale and D. MacKenzie. 1995. On the utility of content analysis in author attribution: The Federalist. Computers and the Humanities, 29:259-270.
21. U. Pieper. 1979. Uber die Aussagekraft statistischer Methoden fur die linguistische Stilanalyse. Narr, Tubingen.
22. D. Ross and D. Hunter. 1994./t-EYEBALL: An interactive system for producing stylistic descriptions and comparisons. Computers and the Humanities, 28:1-11.
23. G. Salton and M.J. McGill. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGrawHill, New York.
24. A. Schiller, S. Teufel, and C. Thielen. 1995. Guidelines fur das Tagging deutscher Textcorpora mit STTS. Technical report, IMS Stuttgart/Seminar f. Sprachwiss. Tubingen.
25. J. Swales. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. A. von der Griin. 1999. Wort-, Morphem- und Allomorphhaufigkeit in domanenspezifischen Korpora des Deutschen. Master's thesis, Institute of Computational Linguistics, University of Erlangen-Niirnberg.
27. Y. Yang and J. Pedersen. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proc. 14th ICML.
28. Y. Yang. 1997. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Technical Report CMU-CS-97-127, Dept. of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.