Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 319, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 410-411

  Flanagin, Annette ^a   Christiansen, Stacy L ^a   Borden, Chris ^a   Kyriacou, Demetrios N ^a   Sietmann, Caroline ^a   Williams, Elaine ^a   Bryant, Larry ^a  

^a JAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; EDITORIAL EVALUATION; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; LETTER; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PEDIATRICS; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; STANDARD; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL POLICIES; INTERNET; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 85041050670     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.20650     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Schriger DL, Chehrazi AC, Merchant RM, Altman DG. Use of the internet by print medical journals in 2003 to 2009: a longitudinal observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(2):153-160.e3.
2. Marcus E. Taming supplemental material. Cell. 2009;139(1):11.
3. National Information Standards Organization; National Federation of Advanced Information Services. Recommended practices for online supplemental journal article materials, January 2013. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/10055/RP-15-2013_Supplemental_Materials.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2017.
4. Maunsell J. Announcement regarding supplemental material. J Neurosci. 2010;30(32):10599-10600.
5. Borowski C. Enough is enough. J Exp Med. 2011;208(7):1337.
6. Pop M, Salzberg SL. Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:237.