Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field

Linguistics

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 1-18

  Berez Kroeker, Andrea L ^a   Gawne, Lauren ^b   Kung, Susan Smythe ^c   Kelly, Barbara F ^d   Heston, Tyler ^e   Holton, Gary ^f   Pulsifer, Peter ^a   Beaver, David I ^g   Chelliah, Shobhana ^h   Dubinsky, Stanley ⁱ   Meier, Richard P ^a   Thieberger, Nick ⁱ   Rice, Keren ^a   Woodbury, Anthony C ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^f PAYAP UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^g National Snow and Ice Data Center   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

attribution; data citation; reproducibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041001326     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling-2017-0032     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berez, Andrea L. 2015. Reproducible research in descriptive linguistics: Integrating archiving and citation into the postgraduate curriculum at the University of Hawai at Manoa. In Amanda Harris, Nicholas Thieberger & Linda Barwick (eds.), Research, records and responsibility, 39-51. Sydney: University of Sydney Press
2. Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Lauren Gawne, Barbara F. Kelly & Tyler Heston. 2017a. A survey of current reproducibility practices in linguistics journals, 2003-2012. https://sites.google com/a/hawaii.edu/data-citation/survey (accessed 11 August 2017)
3. Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Helene N. Andreassen, Lauren Gawne, Gary Holton, Susan Smythe Kung, Peter Pulsifer, Lauren B. Collister, The Data Citation and Attribution in Linguistics Group, & The Linguistics Data Interest Group. 2017b. The Austin principles of data citation in linguistics (Version 0.1). http://site.uit.no/linguisticsdatacitation/austinprinciples/(accessed 27 November 2017)
4. Bird, Steven & Gary Simons. 2003. Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language 79. 557-582
5. Buckheit, Jonathan B. & David L. Donoho. 1995. WaveLab and reproducible research. In Anestis Antoniadis & Georges Oppenheim (eds.), Wavelets and statistics, 55-81. New York: Springer
6. Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse. 2011. Handbook of descriptive linguistic fieldwork London: Springer
7. Crocker, Jennifer & M. Lynne Cooper. 2012. Addressing scientific fraud. Science 334. 1182
8. Data Citation Synthesis Group. 2014. Joint declaration of data citation principles, edited by M. Martone. San Diego: FORCE11. https://www.force11.org/group/joint-declaration-datacitation-principles-final (accessed 9 August 2017)
9. de Leeuw, Jan, 2001 Reproducible research: The bottom line. UCLA Department of Statistics papers http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9050x4r4 accessed 15 March 2014)
10. Donoho, David L. 2010. An invitation to reproducible computational research. Biostatistics 11 385-388
11. European Commission, 2016, Guidelines on FAIR data management in Horizon 2020
12. Fang, Ferric C. & Arturo Casadevall. 2011. Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity 79. 3855-3859
13. Fang, Ferric C., R. Grant Steen & Arturo Casadevall. 2013. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. PNAS Early Edition 334. 1-6
14. Gawne, Lauren, Barbara F. Kelly, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Tyler Heston. 2017. Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions Language Documentation & Conservation 11. 157-189
15. Gezelter, Dan. 2009. Being scientific: Falsifiability, verifiability, empirical tests, and reproducibility The OpenScience project. http://www.openscience.org/blog/?p = 312 (accessed 5 July 2015)
16. Good, Jeff. 2011. Data and language documentation. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, 212-234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Hammarström, Harald. 2015. Ethnologue 16/17/18th editions: A comprehensive review Language 91. 723-737
18. Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis. 2014. Annotated corpora of small languages as refereed publications: A vision. Diversity linguistics comment. http://dlc.hypotheses org/691 (accessed 10 January 2017)
19. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36. 161-195
20. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2006. Language documentation: What is it good for? In Jost Gippert, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel (eds.), Essentials of language documentation, 1-30. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
21. Hulcr, Jiri, Andrew M. Latimer, Jessica B. Henley, Nina R. Rountree, Noah Fierer, Andrea Lucky, Margaret D. Lowman & Robert R. Dunn. 2012. A jungle in there: Bacteria in belly buttons are highly diverse, but predictable. PlosOne 7. e47712. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144827 (accessed 9 August 2017)
22. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas, TX: SIL International
23. Marcus, Adam & Ivan Oransky. 2012. Bring on the transparency index. The Scientist Magazine http://tiny.cc/2012-Transp-marcus
24. Maxwell, Mike. 2012. Electronic grammars and reproducible research. In Sebastian Nordhoff (ed.), Electronic grammaticography (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 4), 207-234. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
25. National Science Foundation 2014, Supporting scientific discovery through norms and practices for software and data citation and attribution (Dear Colleague letter http://www.nsf gov/pubs/2014/nsf14059/nsf14059.jsp?org = NSF. (accessed 11 November 2014)
26. Ryan, Michael J. 2011. Replication in field biology: The case of the frog-eating bat. Science 334 1229-1230
27. Thieberger, Nicholas. 2006. A grammar of South Efate: An Oceanic language of Vanuatu Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
28. Thieberger, Nicholas. 2009. Steps toward a grammar embedded in data. In Patricia Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds.), New challenges in typology: Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 389-408. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
29. Thieberger, Nicholas & Andrea L. Berez. 2012. Linguistic data management. In Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, 90-118. Oxford: Oxford University Press
30. Thieberger, Nick, Anna Margetts, Stephen Morey & Simon Musgrave. 2016. Assessing annotated corpora as research output. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36. 1-21
31. Thomason, Sarah. 1994. The editors department. Language 70. 409-423
32. Tomasello, Michael & Josep Call. 2011. Methodological challenges in the study of primate cognition. Science 334. 1227-1228
33. Woodbury, Anthony C. 2003. Defining documentary linguistics. Language Documentation & Description 1. 35-51
34. Woodbury, Anthony C. 2011. Language documentation. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, 159-186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press