|
|
Volumn 359, Issue , 2017, Pages j4859-
|
|
Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial
[No Author Info available]
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM;
AGED;
ANEURYSM RUPTURE;
CANADA;
CAUSE OF DEATH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
ECONOMICS;
ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HUMAN;
KAPLAN MEIER METHOD;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MORTALITY;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROCEDURES;
PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL;
QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
VASCULAR SURGERY;
AGED;
ANEURYSM, RUPTURED;
AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL;
CANADA;
CAUSE OF DEATH;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HUMANS;
KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE;
LOGISTIC MODELS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS;
QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
|
|
EID: 85040517898
PISSN: None
EISSN: 17561833
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4859 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (154)
|
|
References (0)
|