A cost study for enhanced sludge washing of high-level radioactive waste at the U.S. department of energy Hanford Site

Remediation

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 27-49

  DeMuth, Scott ^a   Shieh, Andrew ^b  

^a Los Alamos National Library   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040488760     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.3440090404     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Swanson, J. L. (1994). Chemical pretreatment of nuclear waste for disposal. New York: Plenum Press.
2. DeMuth, S. F. (1997, March). Cost benefit analysis for enhanced sludge washing of underground storage tank high-level waste (Doc. No. LA-UR-96-965). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
3. Orme, R. M. (1995, August). TWRS process flowsheet (Doc. No. WHC-SD-WM-TI-613). Richland, WA: Westinghouse Hanford Company.
4. DeMuth, S. F. (1997, October). Cost effectiveness of crystalline silico-titanate and resorcinol-formaldehyde ion exchange resins, and enhanced sludge washing with and without chromium oxidation (Doc. No. LA-UR-97-3903). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
5. Orme, R. M. (1996, September). TWRS privatization process technical baseline (Doc. No. WHC-SD-WM-TI-774). Richland, WA: Westinghouse Hanford Company.
6. Revised TWRS inventories. (1999). [On-line]. Available: Http://twins.pnl.gov:8001/htbin/TCD/getTableList.exe.
7. Kirkbride, R. A. & Penwell, D. L. (1997). Tank waste remediation system operation and utilization plan (Doc. No. HNF-SD-WM-SP-012). Richland, WA: Numatec Hanford Corporation.
8. Final environmental impact statement for the tank waste remediation system. (1996, April). [On-line]. Available: Http://www.hanford.gov/eis/twrseis.htm.
9. DeMuth, S. F. (1997, February). Cost savings uncertainty associated with the use of crystalline silico titanate (CST) rather than CS100 ion exchange resin for Hanford waste remediation (Doc. No. LA-UR-97-529). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
10. DeMuth, S. F. (1996, December). Estimating heel retrieval costs for underground storage tank waste at Hanford (Doc. No. LA-UR-96-3038). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
11. Baasel, W. D. (1976). Preliminary chemical engineering plant design. New York: Elsevier.
12. Slaathaug, E. J. (1995, July). TPA engineering data package for the TWRS EIS (Doc. No. WHC-SD-WM-EV-104). Richland, WA: Westinghouse Hanford Company.
13. Washington State Department of Ecology, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Department of Energy. (1994, January). Tri-party agreement (TPA): Hanford federal facility agreement and consent order—Fourth amendment. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Marsh, S. F., Svitra, Z. V., & Bowen, S. M. (1994, November). Distributions of 15 elements on 58 adsorbers from simulated Hanford double-shell slurry feed (Doc. No. LA-12863). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
15. Marsh, S. F., Svitra, Z. V., & Bowen, S. M. (1994, December). Distributions of 12 elements on 64 adsorbers from simulated Hanford neutralized current acid waste (Doc. No. LA-12889). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.