From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards

Environmental Quality Management

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 51-64

  Dias Sardinha, Idalina ^a,b   Reijnders, Lucas ^a   Antunes, Paula ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040478202     PISSN: 10881913     EISSN: 15206483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.10063     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AccountAbility. (1999). AA 1000 Framework. Standard, guidelines and professional qualification; exposure draft. London: AccountAbility.
2. Bennett, M., & James, P. (1999). ISO 14031 and the future of environmental performance evaluation. In M. Bennett, P. James, & L. Klinkers (Eds.), Sustainable measures: Evaluation and reporting of environmental and social performance (pp. 76–97) UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
3. Bieker, T., & Waxenberger, B. (2002). Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics. Paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference 2002, Göteborg, Sweden.
4. [BSI] British Standards Institution, AccountAbility, & Forum for the Future. (2001). The SIGMA project: Sustainability in practice.
5. http://www.projectsigma.com/.
6. Characklis, G.W., & Richards, D.J. (1999). The evolution of industrial environmental performance metrics: Trends and challenges. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 6(3), 387–398.
7. Dias-Sardinha, I., & Reijnders, L. (2001). Environmental performance evaluation and sustainability performance evaluation of organisations: An evolutionary framework. Eco-Management and Auditing, The Journal of Corporate Environmental Management, 8(2), 71–79.
8. Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., & Antunes, P. (2001). Environmental and triple bottom-line performance evaluation in Portuguese organizations. In Proceedings of the 7th European Roundtable on Cleaner Production, Lund.
9. EEA (European Environment Agency). (2001). Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental issues report no 22. Copenhagen: EEA.
10. Epstein, M.J., & Wisner, P.S. (2001, Winter). Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 1–10.
11. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard—Theory and application of a tool for value-based sustainability management. Paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference 2002, Göteborg, Sweden.
12. Gerde, V.W., & Logsdon, J.M. (2001). Measuring environmental performance: Use of the toxics release inventory (TRI) and other U.S. environmental databases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(5), 269–285.
13. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2000). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Boston.
14. http://www.globalreporting.org/.
15. Haq, G., Bailey, P.D., Chadwick, M.J., Forrester, J., Kuylenstierna, J., Leach, G., et al. (2001). Determining the costs to industry of environmental regulation. European Environment, 11, 125–139.
16. Hockerts, K., & O'Rourke, A. (2002). The balanced scorecard—A tool to manage social sustainability. Paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference 2002, Göteborg, Sweden.
17. [IPPC]. (2001). Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, 96/61/EC.
18. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (1999). ISO 14031: Environmental management-environmental performance evaluation-guidelines. Geneva: ISO.
19. ISO (1999). ISO/TR 14032: Environmental management—Examples of environmental performance evaluation. Geneva: ISO.
20. Johnston, A., & Smith, A. (2001). The characteristics and features of corporate environmental performance indicators—A case study of the water industry of England and Wales. Eco-Management and Auditing, The Journal of Corporate Environmental Management, 8(1), 1–11.
21. Jung, E.J., Kim, J.S., & Rhee, S.K. (2001). The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 551–563.
22. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23. KPMG. (1999). KPMG international survey of environmental reporting 1999. WIMM, University of Amsterdam, in collaboration with KPMG International Environment Network.
24. Mauser, A. (2001). The greening of business—Environmental management and performance evaluation: An empirical study in the Dutch dairy industry. Delft: Eburon Publishers.
25. Olsthoorn, X., Tyteca, D., Wehrmeyer, W., & Wagner, M. (2001). Environmental indicators for business: A review of the literature and standardisation methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5), 453–463.
26. [OSHA] Occupational Safety & Health Administration. (2002). Safety & Health Program standards.
27. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/safetyhealth.
28. Reijnders, L. (1998). The Factor X debate: Setting targets for eco-efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 13–22.
29. Rivera-Camino, J. (2001). What motivates European firms to adopt environmental management systems? Eco-Management and Auditing, The Journal of Corporate Environmental Management, 8(3), 134–143.
30. Robèrt, K.H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., Aloisi de Larderel, J., Basile, G., Jansen, J.L., Kuehr, R., et al. (2002). Strategic sustainable development—Selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 197–214.
31. Roy, M. J., Boiral, O., & Lagacé, D. (2001). Environmental commitment and manufacturing excellence: A comparative study within Canadian industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(5), 257–268.
32. [SAI] Social Accountability International. (2000). Social Accountability (SA 8000). Standard.
33. http://www.cepaa.org/sa8000_review.htm
34. Shrivastava, P., & Hart, S. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and Environment, 4(3), 154–165.
35. Sociedade de Engenharia e Inovação Ambiental (SEIA). (2000). Prevenção e Controlo Integrados da Poluição. Implicações da Aplicação da Directiva 96/61/CE (pp. 1–102). Portugal: Direcção-Geral da Indústria.
36. Thoresen, J. (1999). Environmental performance evaluation-a tool for industrial improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(5), 365–370.
37. [UNU] United Nations University. (2000). Zero emissions in practice.
38. http://www.unu.edu/zef/.
39. van Berkel, R. (2000). Sustainable development and cleaner production in minerals and energy production. In Sixth International Symposium on Environmental Issues and Waste Management in Energy and Mineral Production, Alberta, Canada, 30 May–2 June. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology, 1–17.
40. Veleva, V., & Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner production, 9(6), 519–549.
41. [WBCSD] Verfaillie, H.A., & Bidwell, R. (2000). Eco-efficiency: A guide to reporting company performance (pp. 1–38). Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.