Cross sectional study to assess the accuracy of electronic health record data to identify patients in need of lung cancer screening

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Cole, Allison M ^a   Pflugeisen, Bethann ^b   Schwartz, Malaika R ^a   Miller, Sophie Cain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MultiCare Institute for Research and Innovation   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Electronic health records; Lung cancer; Primary care

Indexed keywords

AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING;

EID: 85040445124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3124-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal H. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30.
2. Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, Baumann C, Artis K, Mitchell JP, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(6):411-20.
3. Moyer VA. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330-8.
4. DesRoches C. Progress and challenges in electronic health record adoption: findings from a national survey of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(5):396.
5. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Kralovec P, Foster G, Worzala C, Charles D, et al. Electronic health record adoption in US Hospitals: progress continues, but challenges persist. Health Aff. 2015;34(12):10-377.
6. Step 5: achieve meaningful use stage 1. HealthIT.gov; [updated 2014 Feb 7]. https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/achieve-meaningful-use/core-measures/record-smoking-status. Accessed 27 Apr 2016.
7. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501-4.
8. Lindholm C, Adsit R, Bain P, Reber PM, Brein T, Redmond L, et al. A demonstration project for using the electronic health record to identify and treat tobacco users. WMJ. 2010;109(6):335-40.
9. Boyle RG, Solberg LI, Fiore MC. Electronic medical records to increase the clinical treatment of tobacco dependence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6):S77-82.
10. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(5):503-27.
11. Lindholm C, Adsit R, Bain P, Reber PM, Brein T, Redmond L, Smith SS, Fiore MC. A demonstration project for using the electronic health record to identify and treat tobacco users. WMJ Off Pub State Med Soc Wis. 2010;109(6):335.
12. Bernstein SL, Rosner J, DeWitt M, Tetrault J, Hsiao AL, Dziura J, Sussman S, O'Connor P, Toll B. Design and implementation of decision support for tobacco dependence treatment in an inpatient electronic medical record: a randomized trial. Transl Behav Med. 2017;13:1.
13. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barrón Y, Quaresimo J, Dhopeshwarkar R, Pichardo M. Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(2):77-83.
14. Sandberg A, Skold CM, Grunewald J, Eklund A, Wheelock AM. Assessing recent smoking status by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide levels. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e288864.