Social capital and transactive memory systems in work groups: A multilevel approach

Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Yuan, Yu Connie ^a   Monge, Peter R ^b   Fulk, Janet ^b  

^a 308 Kennedy Hall ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Multilevel; Social capital; Transactive memory

Indexed keywords

MODERATING EFFECT; MULTILEVEL; MULTILEVEL APPROACH; MULTILEVEL STRUCTURAL EQUATION; SOCIAL CAPITALS; THEORETICAL MODELING; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY SYSTEMS;

EID: 85040357151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2005.18779786     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6): 633-644.
2. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Burt, R. S. 2001. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research: 31-56. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
4. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
5. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
6. Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M. B., Griffith, M. A., Hofmann, D. A., James, L. K., Yammarino, F. J., & Bligh, M. C. 2000. Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. Klein, & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 512-553. San Francesco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions: 3-90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 216-239. Boston: Harvard Business School Express.
9. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. 1995. Group versus individual training and groupperformance - the mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4): 384-393.
10. Lin, N. 1982. Social resources and instrumental action. In P. V. Marsden, & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis: 131-145. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Lin, N. 2001. Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research: 3-30. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
12. Moreland, R., & Myaskovsky, L. 2000. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1): 117-133.
13. Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. 2003. Mplus, 2.12 ed. Los Angeles: Author.
14. Rulke, D. L., & Rau, D. 2000. Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organization Management, 25(4): 373-396.
15. Wegner, D. M. 1987. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of group mind. In B. Mullen, & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior: 185-208. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Wegner, D. M. 1995. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3): 319-339.
17. Weick, K. E., & Ashford, S. J. 2000. Learning in organizations. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: 704-731. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.