The comparative analysis of neighborhood sustainability assessment tool

Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 90-105

  Lin, Kuan W ^a   Shih, Chih M ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

ecocommunity; Neighborhood sustainability assessment; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; NEIGHBORHOOD; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

TAIWAN;

EID: 85040335839     PISSN: 23998083     EISSN: 23998091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265813516667299     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ABRI, Ministry of Interior Taiwan (2011) EEWH-EC. Available at: www.abri.gov.tw (accessed 1 May 2015)
2. Adams WM (2006) The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, January 2006, pp.29–31. UK: University of Cambridge
3. Berardi U, (2011) Beyond sustainability assessment systems: Upgrading topics by enlarging the scale of assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development 2: 82–276.
4. BRE (2012) BREEAM Communities Technical Manual SD202. Available at: www.breeam.org (accessed 1 May 2015)
5. Brundtland GH, (1987) Our common future for the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: Oxford University.
6. Building & Construction Authority (2013) BCA Green Mark for Districts (Version 2.0). Available at: www.bca.gov.sg/greenmark/green_mark_criteria.html (accessed 1 May 2015)
7. Cole RJ (2010) Environmental assessment: Shifting scales. In: Edward N (ed.) Designing high-density cities for social and environmental sustainability. London: Earthscan, pp.273–282
8. Deakin M, (2011) Meeting the challenge of learning from what works in the development of sustainable communities. Sustainable Cities and Society 1(4): 244–251.
9. Doughty M R C, Hammond GP, (2004) Sustainability and the built environment at and beyond the city scale. Building and Environment 39: 1223–1233.
10. Evans J, Jones P, (2008) Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: Ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environmental Planning A 40: 1416–1434.
11. Garde A, (2009) Sustainable by design? Insight from U.S. LEED for ND pilot projects. Journal of the American Planning Association 75(4): 424–440.
12. Haapio A, (2012) Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32: 165–169.
13. IBEC (2008) CASBEE for Urban Development Technical Manual 2007 Edition. Available at: www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/index.htm (accessed 1 May 2015)
14. JSBC (2012) CASBEE for Cites Technical Manual 2012 Edition. Available at: www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/index.htm (accessed 1 May 2015)
15. Liu G, Nolte I, Potapova A, et al. (2010) Comparison of world certification system for sustainable buildings. In: SET 2010-9th international conference on sustainable energy technologies, Shanghai, China, 24–27 August 2010
16. Meng SL and Liu GT (2011) Sustainable urban blueprint “eco-city”. CECI, Engineering Technology. Taiwan: CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc., pp.46–57
17. Natural Resources Defense Council, Congress for the New Urbanism, and U.S. Green Building Council (2012) LEED 2009 for neighborhood development. Available at: www.usgbc.org/neighborhoods (accessed 10 May 2015)
18. Reith A, Orova M, (2015) Do green neighbourhood ratings cover sustainability? Ecological Indicators 48: 660–672.
19. Retzlaff RC, (2008) Green building assessment systems: A framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4): 505–519.
20. Sharifi A, (2016) From garden city to eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society 20: 1–16.
21. Sharifi A, Murayama A, (2014) Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. Building and Environment 72: 243–258.