Scarce Resource Allocation During Disasters: A Mixed-Method Community Engagement Study

Chest

Volumn 153, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 187-195

  Biddison, E Lee Daugherty ^a   Gwon, Howard S ^b   Schoch Spana, Monica ^c   Regenberg, Alan C ^d   Juliano, Chrissie ^e   Faden, Ruth R ^d   Toner, Eric S ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICIALS   (United States)

Author keywords

allocation; disaster; ethics; ventilator

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBIVALENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MALE; MARYLAND; MIDDLE AGED; PANDEMIC; PANDEMIC INFLUENZA; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SHORT TERM SURVIVAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISASTER; DISASTER PLANNING; ETHICS; INFLUENZA; MECHANICAL VENTILATOR; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PUBLIC OPINION; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISASTER PLANNING; DISASTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFLUENZA, HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANDEMICS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; VENTILATORS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 85040202113     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. White, D.B., Katz, M.H., Luce, J.M., Lo, B., Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med 150:2 (2009), 132–138.
2. Christian, M.D., Devereaux, A.V., Dichter, J.R., Rubinson, L., Kissoon, N., on behalf of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care. Introduction and executive summary: Care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest 146:4 suppl (2014), 8S–34S.
3. Altevogt, B.M., Stroud, C., Hanson, S.L., Hanfling, D., Gostin, L.O., (eds.) Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations: A Letter Report, 2009, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
4. Biddison, L.D., Berkowitz, K.A., Courtney, B., et al. Ethical considerations: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest 146:4 suppl (2014), e145S–e155S.
5. Christian, M.D., Sprung, C.L., King, M.A., et al. Triage. Care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest 146:4 suppl (2014), e61S–e74S.
6. Powell, T., Christ, K.C., Birkhead, G.S., Allocation of ventilators in a public health disaster. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2:1 (2008), 20–26.
7. Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services. The Harris County public engagement project on pandemic influenza. Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services. https://www.keystone.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/072911-Harris-County-TX-Pandemic-Influence-Engagement-Project-Report.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2017.
8. Public Health: Seattle & King County. Public Engagement project on medical service prioritization during an influenza pandemic. Public Health—Seattle & King County. www.kingcounty.gov/healthservices/health/preparedness/∼/media/health/publichealth/documents/pandemicflu/MedicalServicePrioritization.ashx. Accessed September 20, 2017.
9. Solomon S, Abelson J. Why and when should we use public deliberation? Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;Mar-Apr:17-20.
10. Cavalier, R., (eds.) Approaching Deliberative Democracy: Theory and Practice, 2011, Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
11. Degeling, C., Carter, S.M., Rychetnik, Which public and why deliberate?—A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research. Soc Sci Med 131 (2015), 114–121.
12. Martin, G.P., Citizens, publics, others and their role in participatory processes: a commentary on Lehoux, Daudelin and Abelson. Soc Sci Med 74 (2012), 1851–1853.
13. Cavalier R. Program for deliberative democracy, 2005. http://hss.cmu.edu/pdd/. Accessed September 20, 2017.
14. Daugherty Biddison, E.L., Gwon, H., et al. The community speaks: understanding ethical values in allocation of scarce lifesaving resources during disasters. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:5 (2014), 777–783.
15. Daugherty EL, Cavalier R, Dawson T, et al. Too many patients, too few resources. Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. http://www.bioethicsinstitute.org/scarcemed. Accessed September 20, 2017.
16. Berlinger, N., Jennings, B., Wolf, S.M., Introduction. Berlinger, N., Jennings, B., Wolf, S.M., (eds.) The Hastings Center Guidelines for Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment and Care Near the End of Life, 2nd ed., 2013, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1–8.
17. Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F., Non-maleficence. Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.H., (eds.) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed., 2001, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 113–164.
18. American Medical Association. Decisions near the end of life. JAMA 267:16 (1992), 2229–2233.