Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP

2017 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, ISSE 2017 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages

  Naik, Nitin ^a  

^a MINISTRY OF DEFENCE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AMQP; CoAP; HTTP; Interoperability; IoT Systems; M2M Communication; Messaging Protocol; MQTT; Quality of Services

Indexed keywords

HTTP; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; MACHINE-TO-MACHINE COMMUNICATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

AMQP; COAP; GAIN INSIGHT; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); MESSAGING PROTOCOLS; MQTT; REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION; RELATIVE ANALYSIS;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 85040112745     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SysEng.2017.8088251     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. V. Gazis, M. Gortz, M. Huber, A. Leonardi, K. Mathioudakis, A. Wiesmaier, F. Zeiger, and E. Vasilomanolakis, "A survey of technologies for the internet of things," in 2015 IEEE International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, 2015, pp. 1090-1095.
2. V. Karagiannis, P. Chatzimisios, F. Vazquez-Gallego, and J. Alonso-Zarate, "A survey on application layer protocols for the internet of things," Transaction on IoT and Cloud Computing, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11-17, 2015.
3. A. Foster, "Messaging technologies for the industrial internet and the internet of things whitepaper," PrismTech, 2015.
4. N. Naik, P. Jenkins, P. Davies, and D. Newell, "Native web communication protocols and their effects on the performance of web services and systems," in 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT). IEEE, 2016, pp. 219-225.
5. N. Naik and P. Jenkins, "Web protocols and challenges of web latency in the web of things," in 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). IEEE, 2016, pp. 845-850.
6. R. S. Cohn, "A comparison of AMQP and MQTT," 2011.
7. S. Bandyopadhyay and A. Bhattacharyya, "Lightweight internet protocols for web enablement of sensors using constrained gateway devices," in Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 334-340.
8. N. De Caro, W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, G. Mangino, and G. Reali, "Comparison of two lightweight protocols for smartphone-based sensing," in Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT), 2013 IEEE 20th Symposium on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 1-6.
9. D. Thangavel, X. Ma, A. Valera, H.-X. Tan, and C. K.-Y. Tan, "Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware," in Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1-6.
10. I. Grigorik, "Making the web faster with HTTP 2.0," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 42-49, 2013.
11. T. Jaffey. (2014, February) MQTT and CoAP, IoT protocols. [Online]. Available: https://eclipse.org/community/eclipse-newsletter/2014/february/article2.php
12. A. Ludovici, P. Moreno, and A. Calveras, "TinyCoAP: a novel constrained application protocol (CoAP) implementation for embedding RESTful web services in wireless sensor networks based on tinyos," Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 288-315, 2013.
13. N. S. Han, "Semantic service provisioning for 6LoWPAN: powering internet of things applications on web," Ph.D. dissertation, Institut National des Télécommunications, 2015.
14. J. E. Luzuriaga, M. Perez, P. Boronat, J. C. Cano, C. Calafate, and P. Manzoni, "A comparative evaluation of AMQP and MQTT protocols over unstable and mobile networks," in 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2015, pp. 931-936.
15. G. Marsh, A. P. Sampat, S. Potluri, and D. K. Panda, "Scaling advanced message queuing protocol (AMQP) architecture with broker federation and infiniband," Ohio State University, Tech. Rep. OSU-CISRC-5/09-TR17, 2008.
16. K. Kuladinithi, O. Bergmann, T. Pötsch, M. Becker, and C. Görg, "Implementation of coap and its application in transport logistics," Proc. IP+ SN, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011.
17. S. S. Ngo Manh Khoi, K. Mitra, and C. Ahlund, "Irehmo: An efficient IoT-based remote health monitoring system for smart regions," 2015.
18. J. Stansberry. (2015, October 7) MQTT and CoAP: Underlying protocols for the IoT. [Online]. Available: http://electronicdesign.com/iot/mqtt-and-coap-underlying-protocols-iot
19. J. E. Luzuriaga, M. Perez, P. Boronat, J. C. Cano, C. Calafate, and P. Manzoni, "Testing AMQP protocol on unstable and mobile networks," in Internet and Distributed Computing Systems. Springer, 2014, pp. 250-260.
20. S. Nicholas. (2012, May 31) Power profiling: HTTPS long polling vs. MQTT with SSL, on android. [Online]. Available: http://stephendnicholas.com/posts/power-profiling-mqtt-vs-https
21. W. Colitti, "Communication stacks: Constrained Application Protocol," ISN Interoperable Sensor Networks Deliverable, 2011.
22. W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, and N. De Caro, "Integrating wireless sensor networks with the web," Extending the Internet to Low power and Lossy Networks (IP+SN 2011), 2011.
23. M. Mellia, M. Meo, and C. Casetti, "TCP smart framing: a segmentation algorithm to reduce TCP latency," Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 316-329, 2005.
24. N. Naik and P. Jenkins, "Securing digital identities in the cloud by selecting an apposite federated identity management from saml, oauth and openid connect," in 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 163-174.
25. N. Naik, P. Jenkins, and D. Newell, "Choice of suitable identity and access management standards for mobile computing and communication," in 2017 24th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-6.
26. N. Naik, "Connecting Google cloud system with organizational systems for effortless data analysis by anyone, anytime, anywhere," in IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE). IEEE, 2016.
27. N. Naik and P. Jenkins, "An analysis of open standard identity protocols in cloud computing security paradigm," in 14th IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC 2016). IEEE, 2016.
28. ∗, "A secure mobile cloud identity: Criteria for effective identity and access management standards," in 2016 4th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering (MobileCloud). IEEE, 2016, pp. 89-90.
29. N. Naik, P. Jenkins, N. Savage, and V. Katos, "Big data security analysis approach using computational intelligence techniques in R for desktop users," in IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE, 2016.
30. N. Naik, "Migrating from Virtualization to Dockerization in the cloud: Simulation and evaluation of distributed systems," in IEEE 10th International Symposium on the Maintenance and Evolution of Service-Oriented and Cloud-Based Environments, MESOCA 2016. IEEE, 2016.
31. ∗, "Building a virtual system of systems using Docker Swarm in multiple clouds," in IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE). IEEE, 2016.
32. ∗, "Applying computational intelligence for enhancing the dependability of multi-cloud systems using Docker Swarm," in IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), 2016.
33. OASIS.org. (2015, December 10) MQTT 3.1. 1. edited by Andrew Banks and Rahul Gupta. 29 october 2014. OASIS Standard. [Online]. Available: http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/mqtt-v3.1.1.html