Do animals have a moral right to life? Bioethical challenges to Kant's indirect duty debate and the question of animal killing

The End of Animal Life: A Start for Ethical Debate

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 61-77

  Baranzke, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal ethics; Duty right symmetry; Theory of obligation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040014015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-808-7_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Baranzke, H., 2002. Würde der Kreatur? Die Idee der Würde im Horizont der Bioethik.Würzburger Wissenschaftliche Schriften. Reihe Philosophie Band 328. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, Germany.
2. Baranzke, H., 2004. Does animal suffering count for Kant? A contextual examination of 17 in the Doctrine of Virtue. Essays in Philosophy 5(2): 4.
3. Baranzke, H., 2005. Tierethik, Tiernatur und Moralanthropologie im Kontext von 17 Tugendlehre. Kant-Studien 96: 226-363.
4. Baranzke, H., 2012. Why should we make a difference? How dignity can work in animal ethics.Bioethica Forum 5: 4-12.
5. Cavalieri, P. and Singer, P. (eds.), 1993. The great ape project. Equality beyond humanity.Fourth Estate, London, UK.
6. Cohen, C. and Regan, T., 2001. The animal rights debate. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA.
7. Denis, L., 2000. Kant' s conception of duties regarding animals: reconstructions and reconsideration. History of Philosophy Quarterly 17: 405-423.
8. Denis, L. (ed.), 2005. Immanuel Kant. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Translated by Thomas K. Abbot with revisions by Lara Denis. Broadview Editions, Ltd., Ontario, Canada.
9. Gregor, M. (ed.), 1996. Immanuel Kant. The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
10. Heath, P. and Schneewind, J.B. (eds.), 1997. Immanuel Kant. Lectures on ethics. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Höffe, O., 1993. Moral als Preis der Moderne. Ein Versuch über Wissenschaft, Technik und Umwelt. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
12. Ingensiep, H.W., 1996. Tierseele und tierethische Argumentation in der deutschen philosophischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts. Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin N.S. 4: 103-118.
13. Kain, P., 2010. Duties regarding animals. In: Denis, L. (ed.) Kant's metaphysics of morals. A critical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 210-233.
14. Kant, I., 1900ff. Kant's Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie-Ausgabe (Ak). Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin, Germany.
15. Korsgaard, C. (ed.), 1996. Sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Korsgaard, C., 2004. Fellow creatures: Kantian ethics and our duties to animals. In: Peterson, G.B. (ed.) The tanner lectures on human values. Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp. 77-110.
17. Kottenkamp, F. (ed.), 1840. W. Hogarth's Zeichnungen, nach den Originalen in Stahl gestochen.Mit der vollständigen Erklärung derselben von G.C. Lichtenberg. Literatur-Comptoir, Stuttgart, Germany.
18. Margalit, A., 1996. The decent society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
19. Mozayebi, R., 2013. Die 'Antinomie' des 3 der Tugendlehre. In: Bacin, S., Ferrari, A., La Rocca, C. and Ruffing, M. (eds.) Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, pp. 443-455.
20. Naragon, S., 1990. Kant on Descartes and the Brute. Kant-Studien 81: 1-23.
21. Nelson, L., 1949. System der philosophischen Ethik und Pädagogik. Aus dem Nachlass hrsgg.v. Grete Hermann und Minna Specht, Göttingen, Germany.
22. O'Hagan, E., 2009. Animals, agency, and oblligation in Kantian ethics. Social Theory and Practice 35: 531-554.
23. Regan, T., 2004. The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkley, CA, USA.
24. Sacks, O., 1985. The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd., London, UK.
25. Schopenhauer, A., 1995. On the basis of morality. Translated by E.F.J. Payne, with an introduction by David E. Carthright. Berghahn Books, Providence, RI, USA.
26. Svoboda, T., 2012. Duties regarding nature: a Kantian approach to environmental ethics. Kant- Yearbook 4: 143-163.
27. Timmermann, J., 2005. When the tail wags the dog: animal welfare and indirect duty in Kantian ethics. Kantian Review 10: 128-149.
28. Wood, A.W., 1998. Kant on duties regarding nonrational nature I. Supplement to the Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 72: 189-210.