The added value of integrate-hta guidance in the work processes of health technology assessment agencies

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 597-598

  Van Der Wilt, Gert Jan ^a   Kievit, Wietske ^b   Oortwijn, Wija ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ECORYS Netherlands   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS;

DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 85039973501     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317001027     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Brereton L, et al, this issue
2. Bond K, Weeks L. Using the INTEHRATE-HTA Guidance: Experience from CADTH. This volume
3. Banta HD, Luce BR. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993: 61
4. Daniels N, Sabin J, Accountability for Reasonableness: an update. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1850
5. Daniels N, van der Wil GJ, Health Technology Assessment, deliberative process, and ethically contested issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016; 32: 10-15. (See also the contribution of Bond and Weeks in this volume, reporting on their experience with using the INTEGRATEHTA guidance on addressing ethical issues in the context of HTA)