Balancing ideology and feasibility: A case study on adopting and evaluating open access publishing models for a society journal within philosophy

Information Research

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2017, Pages

  Neuman, Yrsa ^a   Laakso, Mikael ^b  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85039744704     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adema J. & Rutten, P. (2010). Digital monographs in the humanities and social sciences: report on user meeds. (OAPEN project report D3.1.4). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=FB1575C4BDC7400D68EE1CAC0C127616?doi=10.1.1.163.798&rep=rep1&type=pdf
2. Bailey, C. W., Jr. (2010). Open access journals bibliography. Houston, TX: Digital Scholarship. Retrieved from http://www.digital-scholarship.org/oajb/oajb.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6rytcs46C).
3. Beck, R. N., & Lineback, R. H. (1978). Scientific information transfer: the editor’s role. In M. Balaban (Ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference of Scientific Editors, April 24-29, 1977, Jerusalem, Israel, (pp. 419-427). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
4. Björk, B-C., Shen, C., Laakso, M. (2016). A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals. PeerJ, 4. e1990. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1990
5. Björk, B-C. and Turk, Z. (2006). The Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon): an open access journal using an un-paid, volunteer-based organization. Information Research, 11(3), paper 255. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/11-3/paper255.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6rytz5big)
6. Cavaleri, P., Keren, M., Ramello, G., and Valli. V. (2009). Publishing an e-journal on a shoe string: is it a sustainable project? Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(1), 89-101. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2zTozJk
7. Chen X., Olijhoek, T. (2016). Measuring the Degrees of openness of scholarly journals with the Open Access Spectrum (OAS) evaluation tool, Serials Review, 42(2), 108-115. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1182672
8. Crawford, W. (2002). Free electronic refereed journals: getting past the arc of enthusiasm. Learned Publishing, 15(2), 117-123. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531510252848881
9. De Grandis, G. & Neuman, Y. (2014). Measuring openness and evaluating digital academic publishing models: not quite the same business. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 17(3). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0017.302
10. Edgar, B.D., Willinsky, J. (2010). A survey of scholarly journals using Open Journal Systems. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.22230/src.2010v1n2a24.
11. European Commission. (2015). Guidelines on ppen access to scientific publications and research data in Horizon 2020. Version 2.0. October 2015. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ryvZCDrh)
12. Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.cambridge.org/do/titles/open-access-and-humanities-contexts-controversies-and-future/. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ryvi8OZN)
13. Felczak, M., Lorimer, R. & Smith, R. (2007). From production to publishing at CJC online: experiences, insights, and considerations for adoption. First Monday, 12(10). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/1959/1836. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ryvpnGl9)
14. Fortney, K. & Murphy, L. (2016). Getting found: indexing and the independent open access journal. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(5), 508-510. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30836
15. Foxall, K. & Nailor, A. (2016). Sustainability in open access publishing: the ecancer case study. Learned Publishing, 29(2), 113-117. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1023
16. Haggerty, K.D. (2008). Taking the plunge: open access at the Canadian Journal of Sociology. Information Research, 13(1), paper 338. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-1/paper338.html. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ryw26eC1)
17. Laakso, M. (2014). Measuring aoen access: studies of Web-enabled innovation in scientific journal publishing”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10138/45238 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6rywFWYJ0)
18. Laakso, M. & Björk, B.-C. (2013). Delayed open access: an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323-1329. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6rywSzrI3)
19. Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0127502. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
20. Marchi, M.D., Lorenzetti, E. (2016). Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field. Scientometrics, 106(1), 253-26.
21. Matthews, D. (2016, March 16). Should academics be paid for peer review? imes Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/should-academics-be-paid-for-peer-review (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s1CmI4fU)
22. Morrison, H. (2016). Small scholar-led scholarly journals: can they survive and thrive in an open access future? Learned Publishing, 29(2), 83-88. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1015.
23. Neuman, Y., Strandberg, H., Gustafsson, M. & Pichler, A. (2014). Different shades of gold: report on future strategy of open access, D7.5 Agora - scholarly open access research in European philosophy. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/archive/NEUDSO.pdf
24. Neuman, Y., Søndergaard Christensen, A-M., Gustafsson, M. (2016). Note from the Editors, Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 5(1), 5-7. Retrieved from http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3412/Fulltext%20pdf. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s0RXop65)
25. Noorden, R.V. (2013). Open access: The true cost of science publishing. News Feature. Nature, 495(7442), 426-429. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/495426a
26. Norwegian Centre for Research Data. (2016). Norwegian register for scientific journals, series and publishers. Retrieved from https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside?sok.avansert=true&request_locale=en. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ryugQpnu)
27. Polonioli, A. (2016). Metrics, flawed indicators, and the case of philosophy journals. Scientometrics, 108(2), 987-994.
28. Schmoller, S. (2013). The transition to… open access. Oxford: Association for Learning Technology. (ALT Project Report). Retrieved from http://repository.alt.ac.uk/2243/1/Journaltransitioning_20130404_Final_Abs.pdf
29. Solomon, D.J. (2007). Medical Education Online: a case study of an open access journal in health professional education. Information Research, 12(2) paper 301. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-2/paper301.html. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s1CtS74M)
30. Solomon, D.J. (2008). Developing open access journals: a practical guide, Version 1.02. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/2362.pdf. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s1D0p4mM)
31. Solomon, D., Laakso, M., Björk, B-C. (2016). Converting scholarly journals to open access: a review of approaches and experiences., edited by Peter Suber. Cambrdige, MA: Harvard University, Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. Retrieved from https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27803834.
32. Swan, A., Gargouri, Y., Hunt, M., Harnad, S. (2015). Working together to promote open access policy alignment in Europe. Work package 3 report: open access policies PASTEUR4OA Project. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02261.
33. Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report - an overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing. 4th. ed. Oxford: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s1DJ7yUC)
34. Willinsky, J. & Mendis, R. (2007). “Open access on a zero budget: a case study of Postcolonial Text”. Information Research, 12(3) paper 308. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-3/paper308.html.. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6s1DNUJ9l)