Evaluating the benefits of combined and continuous Fog-to-Cloud architectures

Computer Communications

Volumn 113, Issue , 2017, Pages 43-52

  Ramirez, W ^a   Masip Bruin, X ^a   Marin Tordera, E ^a   Souza, V B C ^a   Jukan, A ^b   Ren, G J ^c   Gonzalez de Dios, O ^d  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^c IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^d TELEFONICA RESEARCH   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; FOG; GREEN COMPUTING; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

CLOUD ARCHITECTURES; COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE; EXTENSIVE SIMULATIONS; HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING; MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURES; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; SERVICE RESPONSE TIME;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 85039703605     PISSN: 01403664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2017.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. D. C. Plummer, et al., Top 10 strategic predictions for 2017 and beyond: surviving the storm winds of digital disruption, gartner inc, http://www.gartner.com/binaries/content/assets/events/keywords/cio/ciode5/top_strategic_predictions_fo_315910.pdf, October 2016.
2. Heilig, L., Voss, S., A scientometric analysis of cloud computing literature. Cloud Comput., IEEE Trans. 2:3 (2014), 266–278, 10.1109/TCC.2014.2321168.
3. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S., Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing MCC ’12, 2012, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13–16, 10.1145/2342509.2342513.
4. Chiang, M., Zhang, T., Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J., PP(99), 2016 1–1. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2584538.
5. https://www.openfogconsortium.org/ [Online; accessed June-2016], 2017.
6. Masip-Bruin, X., Marin-Tordera, E., Tashakor, G., Jukan, A., Ren, G.J., Foggy clouds and cloudy fogs: a real need for coordinated management of fog-to-cloud computing systems. IEEE Wireless Commun. 23:5 (2016), 120–128, 10.1109/MWC.2016.7721750.
7. Deng, R., Lu, R., Lai, C., Luan, T., Towards power consumption delay tradeoff by workload allocation in cloud fog computing. Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, 3909–3914, 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248934.
8. Deng, R., Lu, R., Lai, C., Luan, T.H., Liang, H., Optimal workload allocation in fog-cloud computing towards balanced delay and power consumption. IEEE Internet Things J., PP(99), 2016 1–1. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2565516.
9. Simoens, P., Herzeele, L.V., Vandeputte, F., Vermoesen, L., Challenges for orchestration and instance selection of composite services in distributed edge clouds. 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), 2015, 1196–1201.
10. Aazam, M., Huh, E.-N., Dynamic resource provisioning through Fog micro datacenter. Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, 105–110, 10.1109/PERCOMW.2015.7134002.
11. Tang, B., Chen, Z., Hefferman, G., Wei, T., He, H., Yang, Q., A hierarchical distributed fog computing architecture for big data analysis in smart cities. Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015 ASE BD&SI ’15, 2015, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 28:1–28:6, 10.1145/2818869.2818898.
12. IBM Bluemix at http://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/.
13. https://aws.amazon.com/greengrass.
14. R.M. Arasanal, D.U. Rumani, Distributed computing and internet technology: 9th international conference, ICDCIT 2013, Bhubaneswar, India, February 5, 8, 2013. proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 115, 125. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36071-8_8.
15. Valancius, V., Laoutaris, N., Massoulié L., Diot, C., Rodriguez, P., Greening the Internet with nano data centers. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies CoNEXT ’09, 2009, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 37–48, 10.1145/1658939.1658944.
16. http://www.craax.upc.edu/, [Online; accessed September 2017], 2017.
17. https://omnetpp.org/, [Online; accessed September 2017], 2017.
18. Curtis, A., Kim, W., Yalagandula, P., Mahout: low overhead datacenter traffic management using end host based elephant detection. INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, 2011, 1629–1637, 10.1109/INFCOM.2011.5934956.
19. Hassan, M.A., Xiao, M., Wei, Q., Chen, S., Help your mobile applications with fog computing. 2015 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking - Workshops (SECON Workshops), 2015, 1–6, 10.1109/SECONW.2015.7328146.
20. Huang, D., Xing, T., Wu, H., Mobile cloud computing service models: a user-centric approach. IEEE Netw. 27:5 (2013), 6–11, 10.1109/MNET.2013.6616109.
21. Bai, F., Sadagopan, N., Helmy, A., IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks. INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications. IEEE Societies, 2, 2003, 825–835 vol.2, 10.1109/INFCOM.2003.1208920.
22. Caliskan, M., Barthels, A., Scheuermann, B., Mauve, M., Predicting parking lot occupancy in vehicular ad hoc networks. 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring, 2007, 277–281.