Comparison of a structured home-based rehabilitation programme with conventional supervised pulmonary rehabilitation: A randomised non-inferiority trial

Thorax

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 29-36

  Horton, Elizabeth J ^a   Mitchell, Katy E ^b   Johnson Warrington, Vicki ^b   Apps, Lindsay D ^b   Sewell, Louise ^b   Morgan, Mike ^b   Taylor, Rod S ^c   Singh, Sally J ^b,d  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

exercise; pulmonary rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CHRONIC RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPNEA; ENDURANCE SHUTTLE WALK TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOME REHABILITATION; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; INCREMENTAL SHUTTLE WALK TEST; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY REHABILITATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; SELF CARE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HOME CARE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DYSPNEA; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85039053836     PISSN: 00406376     EISSN: 14683296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208506     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bolton CE, Bevan-Smith EF, Blakey JD, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults. Thorax 2013;68(Suppl 2):887-8.
2. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:e13-64.
3. Maltais F, Bourbeau J, Shapiro S, et al. Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:869-78.
4. Güell MR, de Lucas P, Gáldiz JB, et al. Home vs hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a spanish multicenter trial. Arch Bronconeumol 2008;44:512-8.
5. Puente-Maestu L, Sánz ML, Sánz P, et al. Comparison of effects of supervised versus self-monitored training programmes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2000;15:517-25.
6. Holland AE, Mahal A, Hill CJ, et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax 2017;72:57-65.
7. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in Pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:e13-64.
8. Keating A, Lee AL, Holland AE. Lack of perceived benefit and inadequate transport influence uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. J Physiother 2011;57:183-90.
9. Spruit MA, Pitta F, Garvey C, et al. Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Eur Respir J 2014;43:1326-37.
10. Mitchell KE, Johnson-Warrington V, Apps LD, et al. A self-management programme for COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2014;44:1538-47.
11. Lewin B, Robertson IH, Cay EL, et al. Effects of self-help post-myocardial-infarction rehabilitation on psychological adjustment and use of health services. Lancet 1992;339:1036-40.
12. Williams JE, Singh SJ, Sewell L, et al. Development of a self-reported chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ-SR). Thorax 2001;56:954-9.
13. Sewell L, Singh SJ, Williams JE, et al. How long should outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation be? A randomised controlled trial of 4 weeks versus 7 weeks. Thorax 2006;61:767-71.
14. Apps LD, Mitchell KE, Harrison SL, et al. The development and pilot testing of the self-management programme of activity, coping and education for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SPACE for COPD). Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2013;8:317-27.
15. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-70.
16. Vincent E, Sewell L, Wagg K, et al. Measuring a change in self-efficacy following pulmonary rehabilitation: an evaluation of the PRAISE tool. Chest 2011;140:1534-9.
17. Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Scott S, et al. Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax 1992;47:1019-24.
18. Revill SM, Morgan MD, Singh SJ, et al. The endurance shuttle walk: a new field test for the assessment of endurance capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999;54:213-22.
19. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-15.
20. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594-604.
21. Singh SJ, Jones PW, Evans R, et al. Minimum clinically important improvement for the incremental shuttle walking test. Thorax 2008;63:775-7.
22. Pepin V, Laviolette L, Brouillard C, et al. Significance of changes in endurance shuttle walking performance. Thorax 2011;66:115-20.
23. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponses in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
24. Effing T, Zielhuis G, Kerstjens H, et al. Community based physiotherapeutic exercise in COPD self-management: a randomised controlled trial. Respir Med 2011;105:418-26.
25. Monninkhof E, van der Valk P, van der Palen J, et al. Effects of a comprehensive selfmanagement programme in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2003;22:815-20.
26. Boxall AM, Barclay L, Sayers A, et al. Managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the community. A randomized controlled trial of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for elderly housebound patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2005;25:378-85.
27. Chaplin E, Hewitt S, Apps L, et al. Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013682.
28. Ninot G, Moullec G, Picot MC, et al. Cost-saving effect of supervised exercise associated to COPD self-management education program. Respir Med 2011;105:377-85.
29. Evans RA, Singh SJ, Collier R, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation is successful for COPD irrespective of MRC dyspnoea grade. Respir Med 2009;103:1070-5.
30. Greening NJ, Evans RA, Williams JE, et al. Does body mass index influence the outcomes of a Waking-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme in COPD? Chron Respir Dis 2012;9:99-106.
31. Sewell L, Singh SJ, Williams JE, et al. Can individualized rehabilitation improve functional independence in elderly patients with COPD? Chest 2005;128:1194-200.
32. Boutou AK, Tanner RJ, Lord VM, et al. An evaluation of factors associated with completion and benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD. BMJ Open Respir Res 2014;1:e000051.
33. Dritsaki M, Johnson-Warrington V, Mitchell K, et al. An economic evaluation of a selfmanagement programme of activity, coping and education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chron Respir Dis 2016;13:48-56.