[Formula Presented] constraints on the minimal supergravity model with large [Formula Presented]

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 1998, Pages

  Baer, Howard ^a   Brhlik, Michal ^b   Castaño, Diego ^c   Tata, Xerxes ^d  

^a Florida State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Virginia Peninsula   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85039014907     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.015007     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. See, e.g., H. Haber, “Woodlands Superworld,” hep-ph/9308209 (1993).
2. See, e.g., M. Drees and S. Martin, in Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and New Physics at the TeV Scale, edited by T. Barklow, S. Dawson, H. Haber, and J. Seigrist (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995)
3. see also J. Amundson, in New Directions for High Energy Physics, edited by D. G. Cassel, L. Trindle Gennari, and R. H. Siemann (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, 1996), hep-ph/9609374.
4. A. Chamseddine, R. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 970 (1982)
5. R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara, and C. Savoy, Phys. Lett. 119B, 343 (1982)
6. L. J. Hall, J. Lykken, and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2359 (1983).
7. CLEO Collaboration, M. S. Alam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2885 (1995). Note that recently the ALEPH Collaboration (at the International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Jerusalem, Israel, 1997) has made a preliminary announcement of a measurement of (Formula presented). We do not include this preliminary result in our analysis, and caution the reader that some of our conclusions may change if the (Formula presented) decay rate turns out to be closer to this ALEPH value.
8. S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B353, 591 (1991).
9. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Phys. Lett. B 309, 86 (1993)
10. J. Lopez, D. Nanopoulos, and G. Park, Phys. Rev. D 48, 974 (1993)
11. N. Oshimo, Nucl. Phys. B404, 20 (1993)
12. R. Garisto and J. Ng, Phys. Lett. B 315, 372 (1993)
13. Phys. Lett. BM. Diaz, 322, 207 (1994)
14. Phys. Lett. BY. Okada, 315, 119 (1993)
15. F. Borzumati, Z. Phys. C 63, 291 (1994)
16. P. Nath and R. Arnowitt, Phys. Lett. B 336, 395 (1994)
17. G. Kane, C. Kolda, L. Roszkowski, and J. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6173 (1994)
18. Phys. Rev. DF. Borzumati, M. Drees, and M. Nojiri, 51, 341 (1995)
19. Phys. Rev. DV. Barger, M. Berger, P. Ohmann, and R. Phillips, 51, 2438 (1995)
20. F. Bertolini and F. Vissani, Z. Phys. C 67, 513 (1995)
21. J. Lopez, D. Nanopoulos, X. Wang, and A. Zichichi, Phys. Rev. D 51, 147 (1995)
22. Phys. Rev. DJ. Wu, R. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, 51, 1371 (1995)
23. B. de Carlos and J. A. Casas, Phys. Lett. B 349, 300 (1995)
24. Phys. Lett. BB. de CarlosJ. A. Casas351, 604(E) (1995).
25. H. Baer and M. Brhlik, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3201 (1997).
26. H. Baer, C. H. Chen, M. Drees, F. Paige, and X. Tata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 986 (1997).
27. M. Carena and C. Wagner, hep-ph/9407209 (1994)
28. C. Wagner, hep-ph/9510341 (1995)
29. W. de Boer, Z. Phys. C 71, 415 (1996)
30. M. Carena, P. Chankowski, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B491, 103 (1997).
31. M. Carena, J. Espinosa, M. Quiros, and C. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 355, 209 (1995)
32. M. Carena, M. Quiros, and C. E. M. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B461, 407 (1996)
33. H. Haber, R. Hempfling, and A. Hoang, Z. Phys. C 75, 539 (1997).
34. See Borzumati 6.
35. H. Anlauf, Nucl. Phys. B430, 245 (1994).
36. See e.g., B. Brinstein, M. J. Savage, and M. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B319, 271 (1989)
37. A. Ali, “20th International Nathiagali Summer College on Physics and Contemporary Needs,” Bhurban, Pakistan, 1995, hep-ph/9606324.
38. C. Greub, T. Hurth, and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 380, 385 (1996)
39. C. GreubT. HurthD. WylerPhys. Rev. D 54, 3350 (1996).
40. A. Ali and C. Greub, Z. Phys. C 49, 431 (1991)
41. A. AliC. GreubPhys. Lett. B 259, 182 (1991)
42. Phys. Lett. BA. AliC. Greub287, 191 (1992)
43. Phys. Lett. BA. AliC. Greub361, 146 (1995)
44. A. AliC. GreubZ. Phys. C 60, 433 (1993)
45. N. Pott, Phys. Rev. D 54, 938 (1996).
46. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Reina, Nucl. Phys. B415, 403 (1994).
47. M. Misiak and M. Münz, Phys. Lett. B 344, 308 (1995).
48. K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak, and M. Münz, Phys. Lett. B 400, 206 (1997).
49. P. Cho and B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B365, 279 (1991).
50. H. Arason, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3945 (1992).
51. Ref. 18, A. Buras, A. Kwiatkowski, and N. Pott, Phys. Lett. B 414, 157 (1997)
52. confirming the results of K. Adel and Y. P. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4945 (1994)
53. and C. Grueb and T. Hurth, hep-ph/9708214 (1997) quote a somewhat higher SM value of (Formula presented) than is presented here. The above works include a 3% increase due to non-perturbative effects calculated by
54. M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 397, 275 (1997) plus the corrected value of (Formula presented) in their calculations, which conspire to increase the SM decay rate by about 10%. These effects would similarly increase our estimate of the SUSY contributions.
55. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and G. F. Giudice, hep-ph/9710335.
56. G. Anderson and D. Castaño, Phys. Lett. B 347, 300 (1995)
57. G. AndersonD. CastañoPhys. Rev. D 52, 1693 (1995)
58. see also, K. L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay, and P. Nath, hep-ph/9710473 (1997).
59. For a recent review, see G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996)
60. see also M. Drees and M. Nojiri, Phys. Rev. D 47, 376 (1993)
61. Phys. Rev. Dthe results shown here are from H. Baer and M. Brhlik, 53, 597 (1996); further references are included in these reports.
62. See e.g., J. Primack, astro-ph/9707285 (1997).
63. H. Baer and M. Brhlik, Phys. Rev. D 57, 567 (1998).
64. H. Baer, C. H. Chen, M. Drees, F. Paige, and X. Tata, hep-ph/9802441 (1998).
65. T. Blazek and S. Raby, hep-ph/9712257 (1997).