Media consumption and creation in attitudes toward and knowledge of inflammatory bowel disease:web-based survey

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2017, Pages

  Groshek, Jacob ^a   Basil, Miles ^b   Guo, Ling ^b   Ward, Sarah Parker ^a   Francis, A Farraye ^b   Jason Reich, ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Health Communication; Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Social Media; Social Stigma

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL MEDIA; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85038912200     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7624     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Taft TH, Keefer L, Leonhard C, Nealon-Woods M. Impact of perceived stigma on inflammatory bowel disease patient outcomes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009 Jan;15(8):1224-1232. [doi: 10.1002/ibd.20864]
2. Taft TH, Ballou S, Keefer L. A preliminary evaluation of internalized stigma and stigma resistance in inflammatory bowel disease. J Health Psychol 2013 Apr;18(4):451-460. [doi: 10.1177/1359105312446768 [Medline: 22689587]
3. Barthel M, Shearer E, Gottfried J, Mitchell A. Pew Research Center.: Pew Research Center; 2015 Jul 14. The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook URL: Http://pewrsr.ch/1M8rcq2 [WebCite Cache ID 6sreoggYr]
4. Rice RE, Katz JE. The Internet and Health Communication: Experiences and Expectations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
5. Guo L, Reich J, Groshek J, Farraye FA. Social media use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016 May;22(5):1231-1238. [doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000713 [Medline: 26894839]
6. Frohlich DO. The social construction of inflammatory bowel disease using social media technologies. Health Commun 2016 Nov;31(11):1412-1420. [doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1077690] [Medline: 27050670]
7. Gray GM, Ropeik DP. Dealing with the dangers of fear: The role of risk communication. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(6):106-116 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12442846]
8. Groshek J, Katz JE, Cutino C, Zhong Q. Media, microbes, and misinformation: Survey evidence of information channels and fatalism in augmenting a global health threat. 2016 Presented at: Genes, Germs, and GMOs Workshop; April 2016; Boston University, Boston, MA.
9. Castells M. E-health networks and social transformations: Expectations of centralization, experiences of decentralization. In: The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar; 2004.
10. Katz JE, Rice RE. Public views of mobile medical devices and services: A US national survey of consumer sentiments towards RFID healthcare technology. Int J Med Inform 2009 Feb;78(2):104-114. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.001] [Medline: 18619897]
11. O'Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. J Am Med Assoc 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1962-1964. [Medline: 11035893]
12. Halpern D, Gibbs J. Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comput Human Behav 2013;29(3):1159-1168. [doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008]
13. Katz JE. Struggle in cyberspace: Fact and friction on the World Wide Web. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 1998 Nov;560(1):194-199. [doi: 10.1177/0002716298560001015]
14. Katz JE, Rice RE, Acord S, Dasgupta K, David K. Personal mediated communication the concept of community in theory practice. In: Kalbfleisch PJ, editor. Communication Yearbook 28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004:315-372.
15. Garrett RK. Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Hum Commun Res 2011 Mar 1;37(2):255-274. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x]
16. CDC.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. 2008-2009 Salmonella typhimurium outbreak response URL: Https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium/SalmonellaTyphimuriumAAR.pdf [accessed 2017-08-20 [WebCite Cache ID 6sssYT6OV]
17. Rutsaert P, Regan A, Pieniak Z, McConnon A, Moss A, Wall PG, et al. The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Trends Food Sci Technol 2013 Mar;30(1):84-91. [doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.10.006]
18. Oh O, Agrawal M, Rao HR. Community intelligence and social media services : A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Q 2013;37(2):407-426 [FREE Full text]
19. Grant L, Hausman BL, Cashion M, Lucchesi N, Patel K, Roberts J. Vaccination persuasion online: A qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. J Med Internet Res 2015 May 29;17(5):e133 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4153] [Medline: 26024907]
20. Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Hum Commun Res 1977 Sep;4(1):58-65. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x]
21. McCroskey JC. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1982.
22. Ccfa.: Crohn's and Colitis Foundation; 2016. Get involved URL: Http://www.ccfa.org [accessed 2016-06-26] [WebCite Cache ID 6sreyTo00]
23. Danese S, Fiocchi C. Ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2011 Nov 3;365(18):1713-1725. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1102942] [Medline: 22047562]
24. Harrington S, Highfield T, Bruns A. More than a backchannel: Twitter and television. Partic J Audience Reception Stud 2013;10(1):405-409 [FREE Full text]
25. Groshek J, Dimitrova D. A cross-section of political involvement, partisanship and online media in middle America during the 2008 presidential campaign. Atl J Commun 2013;21(2):108-124. [doi: 10.1080/15456870.2013.773484]
26. Baumeister RF, Finkel EJ. Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
27. Metaxas PT, Mustafaraj E. From obscurity to prominence in minutes: Political speech and real-time search. 2010 Presented at: Web Science Conference; April 26-27, 2010; Raleigh, NC URL: Http://cs.wellesley.edu/~pmetaxas/Metaxas-Obscurity-to-prominence.pdf
28. Sunstein CR. The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 2002 Jun;10(2):175-195. [doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00148]
29. Keller C, Siegrist M, Gutscher H. The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Anal 2006;26(3):631-639. [doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x]
30. Peifer J, Garrett K. Comm.osu. 2014. Best practices for working with opt-in online panels URL: Https://comm.osu.edu/sites/comm.osu.edu/files/Opt-in-panel-best-practices.pdf [accessed 2017-07-15] [WebCite Cache ID 6srec1TEM]
31. Gil de Zúñiga H, Garcia-Perdomo V, McGregor SC. What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. J Commun 2015;65(5):793-815. [doi: 10.1111/jcom.12174]