Film and globalization

Communications Media, Globalization, and Empire

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 33-52

  Miller, Toby ^a   Maxwell, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038881573     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Anderson Report on Indian cinema (2000). Report commissioned from Arthur Anderson by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FCCI), Mumbai: India.
2. Chinese film industry to go global (29 March 2001). Xinhua report published in China Daily. Retrieved 1 July 2005 from www.china.org.cn
3. Global investing: Why Hollywood is losing the limelight (8 March 2001). Financial Times, p. 24.
4. Global media breakdown (19-25 February 2001). Variety, p. 14.
5. Guide to international film production (2000). Ernst and Young report, available at http://www.ey.c om/global/gcr. nsf/International/2001_Guide_to_International_Film_Pro duction
6. The imbalance of trade in films and television programmes between North America and Europe continues to deteriorate. (9April 2002). Strasbourg: EuropeanAudiovisual Observatory. Retrieved 1 July 2005, from http://www.obs.coe.int
7. Mexico's Film Industry. San Miguelwood. (10 January 2004) The Economist, 31. Retrieved 1July 2005 from http://www.economist.com
8. Abel, R. (1999). The Red Rooster scare: Making cinema American, 1900-1910. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Acland, C.R. (2003). Screen traffic: Movies, multiplexes, and global culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
10. Ahmed, A. (7 October 2003). Dollywood studios opens floor to movie makers. Gulf News. reprinted in Pakistani Perspective. Retrieved 1 July 2005, from http://www.pakp.com
11. Bjork, U.J. (2000). The US Commerce Department aids Hollywood exports, 1921-1933. Historian, 62(3), 575-587.
12. Calder, P. (29 November 2003). The hoard of the rings. New Zealand Herald.
13. Center for Entertainment Industry Data and Research (CEIDR) (2002) The migration of feature film production from the US to Canada and beyond: Year 2001 production report. Encino, CA: CEIDR.
14. Cherneff, J.B.R. (1991). Dreams are made like this: Hortense Powdermaker and the Hollywood film industry. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(4), 429-440.
15. Chidley, J. (11-12 April 2000). Hollywood's welfare bums. Canadian Business, 3.
16. Cohen, K (7 March 2003). The cartoon that came in from the cold. Guardian, p. 10.
17. Cook, DA. (2000). History of the American cinema, Vol. 9. Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970-1979. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
18. De la Fuente, A.M. & Goodridge, M. (10 February 2003). Valenti's Mexican stand-off. ScreenDaily. Retrieved February 10, 2003 from http://www.ScreenDaily.com
19. DiPersio, V. & Bardach, A. (2001). The monster that ate Hollywood. Frontline and Riot Pictures. Retrieved July 1, 2005 from http://pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/hollywood. Boston: WGBH.
20. Directors Guild of America (18 May 2000). DGA commends action by Governor Gray Davis to fight runaway production. DGA Press Release.
21. European Audiovisual Observatory (2003). Focus 2003: World film market trends/tendances du marché mondial du film. Strasbourg, Germany: EuropeanAudiovisual Observatory.
22. Ganti, T. (2002). And yet my heart is still Indian: The Bombay film industry and the (h)indianization of Hollywood. In F.D. Ginsburg, L. Abu-Lughod & B. Larkin (eds), Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain, pp. 281-300. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Gasher, M. (2002). Holly woodnorth: The feature film industry in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
24. Goldsmith, B. & O'Regan, T. (2003). Cinema cities, media cities: The contemporary international studio complex. Sydney: Australian Film Commission.
25. Grantham, B. (2000). Some big bourgeois brothel: Contexts for France's culture wars with France. UK: University of Luton Press/J ohn Libbey Publishing.
26. Greenwald, W.I. (1952). The control of foreign trade: A half-century of film trade with Great Britain. Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 25(1), 39-49.
27. Groves, D. (20-26 November 2000). CineAsia basks in rebound. Variety, 45.
28. Groves, D. (12-18 March 2001a). China sez it can't handle 20 US pix. Variety, 20.
29. Groves, D. (2-8 April 2001b). Foreign exchange flattens H'Wood. Variety, 7, 45.
30. Guider, E. (9 May 2000). Mutual pacts o'seas on pix. Daily Variety, 4.
31. Guider, E., Dawtrey, A., Meza, E., Schwarzacher, L., James, A., Vivarelli, N., et al. (5-11 January 2004). The incredible shrinking aud. Variety, 1.
32. Guttridge, P. (11 July 1996). Our green and profitable land. Independent, 8-9.
33. Hancock, D. (1999). Film production in Europe: A comparative study of film production costs in five European territories France-Germany-Italy-Spain-UK. Strasbourg, Germany: European Audiovisual Laboratory.
34. Hayes, D. (8-14 January 2001). Late rally lifts wilted wickets. Variety, 9, 16.
35. Hays, W. (1927). Supervision from within. In J.P. Kennedy (ed.), The story of the films as told by leaders of the industry to the students of the Graduate School of BusinessAdministration George F. BakerFoundation Harvard University, pp. 29-54. Chicago: A.W. Shaw.
36. Hearon, F. (1938). The motion-picture program and policy of the United States government. Journal of Educational Sociology, 12(3), 147-162.
37. High, P.B. (2003). The imperial screen: Japanese film culture in the Fifteen Years' War, 1931-1945. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38. Hozic, AA. (2001). Hollyworld: Space, power, and fantasy in the American economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39. Johnston, E. (4 March 1950). Messengers from a free country. Saturday Review of Literature, 9-12.
40. Kahn, E.J., Jr. (1981). Jock: The life and times of John Hay Whitney. Garden City: Doubleday.
41. Kent, S.R. (1927). Distributing the product. In J.P. Kennedy (ed.), The Story of the Films as Told by Leaders of the Industry to the Students of the Graduate School of Business Administration George F. Baker Foundation Harvard University, pp. 203-232. Chicago: A W. Shaw.
42. Klein, C. (2003). The Asian factor in global Hollywood: Breaking down the notion of a distinctly American cinema. YaleGlobal Online.
43. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950). Foreword. In L. A. Handel. (Ed.), Hollywood looks at its audience, pp. ix-xiv. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
44. Ledbetter, J. (4 November 2002). The culture blockade. The Nation, 37.
45. Library of Congress (1964). The US ideological effort: Government agencies andprograms: Study prepared for the subcommittee on international organizations and movements of the committee on foreign affairs. Washington: Author.
46. Lev, P. (2003). History of the American cinema: Vol. 7. Transforming the screen 1950-1959. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
47. Major, W. (1997). Hollywood's Asian strategy: The Asian millennium could catch Hollywood flat-footed. Transpacific, 68.
48. Mezias, J. M. & Mezias, S. J. (2000). Resource partitioning, the founding of specialist firms, and innovation: TheAmerican feature film industry, 1912-1929. Organization Science, 11(3), 306-322.
49. Miller, D. & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519-543.
50. Miller, T. & Yúdice, G. (2002). Cultural policy. London: Sage.
51. Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R. & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: BFI.
52. Pauwels, C. & Loisen, J. (2003). The WTO and the audiovisual sector: Economic free trade vs. cultural horse trading? European Journal of Communication, 18(3), 291-313.
53. Powdermaker, H. (1950). Hollywood: The dream factory: An anthropologist looks at the movie-makers. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
54. Reis, R. (2001). Brazil: Love it and hate it: Brazilians' ambiguous relationships with Disney. Dazzled by Disney? In: J. Wasko, M. Phillips &E. R. Meehan (eds), The Global Disney Audiences Project, pp. 88-101. London: Leicester University Press.
55. Robinson, J. (2000). Reel renaissance. Business Mexico, 10(4), 51-55.
56. Sakr, N. (2001). Satellite realms: Transnational television, globalization and the Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris.
57. Saunders, F. S. (1999). Cultural cold war: The CM and the world of arts and letters. New York: New Press.
58. Schatz, T. (1997). History of the American cinema: Vol. 6. Boom and bust: The American cinema in the 1940s. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
59. Scott, A.J. (2002). A new map of Hollywood: The production and distribution of American motion pictures. Regional Studies, 36(9), 957-975.
60. Seguin, D. (15 September 2003). The battle for Hollywood North. Canadian Business, 55.
61. Storper, M. (1994). The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: External economies, the division of labour and the crossing of industrial divides. In A. Amin (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader, pp. 195-226. Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Tegel, S. (February 2001a). Sand and stardust. Business Mexico.
63. Tegel, S. (August 2001b). Celluloid chic. Latin Trade.
64. Tegel, S. (December 2002). Cue the governor's helicopter. Latin Trade.
65. Trumpbour, J. (2002). Selling Hollywood to the World: US and European struggles for mastery of the global film industry, 1920-1950. Cambridge University Press.
66. Ugalde, V. (2004). Cine Mexicano, a diez anos del TLC. Infodac - Suplemento especial, 52.
67. Ulich, P.C. & Simmons L. (2001). Motion picture production: To run or stay made in the USA. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 21, 357-370.
68. UNESCO (2000a). Statistics. Retrieved 1 July 2005 from http://www.unescostat.unesco.org/statsen/Sta- tistics/yearbook/tables/CultAndCom/T able_IV_12_America.html
69. UNESCO (2000b). Cinema: A survey on national cinematography. Retrieved 1 July 2005 from http://www.unesco.org/culture/industries/cinema/html_eng/trade.shtm
70. Valenti, J. (13 March 2003). Intellectualcopyrightpiracy: Linkstoorganizedcrimeandterrorism. Testimony before SubCommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property Committee of the Judiciary US House of Representatives.
71. Walsh, M. (1997). Fighting the American invasion with cricket, roses, and marmalade for breakfast. Velvet Light Trap, 40, 3-17.
72. Wanger, W. (1950). Donald Duck and diplomacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14(3), 443-452.
73. Wicker, H.S. (2003). Making a run for the border: Should the United States stem runaway film and television production through tax and other financial incentives? George Washington International Law Review, 35, 461-499.