Assessing the potential sustainability benefits of agricultural residues: Biomass conversion to syngas for energy generation or to chemicals production

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 172, Issue , 2018, Pages 4162-4169

  Lozano, Francisco J ^a   Lozano, Rodrigo ^b,c  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

^c ORGANISATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemicals; Eco efficiency; Energy generation; Gasification; Residual biomass

Indexed keywords

NOISE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL;

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS; CONTROL METHODS; ENGINEERING CONTROLS; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENS; MANUFACTURING COMPANIES; MANUFACTURING SECTOR; NOISE PROBLEMS; PRODUCTION PROCESS;

MANUFACTURE;

EID: 85038856341     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.037     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aldana, H., Lozano, F.J., Acevedo, J., Evaluating the potential for producing energy from agricultural residues in México using MILP optimization. Biomass Bioenergy 67 (2014), 372–389, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.022 Available at:.
2. Anastai, J.L., SASOL: South Africa's Oil from Coal Story–Background for Environmental Asessment. 1980, D.C, Washington.
3. Bain, R.L., Material and Energy Balances for Methanol from Biomass Using Biomass Gasifiers Material and Energy Balances for Methanol from Biomass Using Biomass Gasifiers. 1992.
4. Bain, R.L., World Biofuels Assessment; Worldwide Biomass Potential: Technology Characterizations (Milestone Report)., 2007 Available at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?query_id=0&page=0&osti_id=921804/npapers://a0cac570-6072-44e1-9d44-cdd15f758707/Paper/p503.
5. Biddy, M.J., Scarlata, C.J., Kinchin, C.M., Chemicals from Biomass: a Market Assessment of Bioproducts with Near-term Potential. 2016.
6. Blundell, T., et al. Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source. 2002 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140670102804969.
7. Bradlee, C.A., Saling, P., Uhlman, B., Submission for NSF Protocol P352 Validation and Verification of Eco-efficiency Analyses, Part a. BASF 's Eco-efficiency Analysis Methodology. 2009 (Florham Park, New Jersey).
8. Brown, E., Mann, M., Initial Market Assessment for Small-scale Biomass-based CHP. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.), 2008 Available at: http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS94092.
9. Carter, C., Rausser, G., Smith, A., The Effect of the US Ethanol Mandate on Corn Prices. 2012 Available at: http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/the-effect-of-the-us-ethanol-mandate-on-corn-prices/.
10. Fortenbery, T.R., Park, H., The Effect of Ethanol Production on the U.S. National Corn Price. 2008 Madison, Wisconsin. Available at: https://www.aae.wisc.edu/pubs/sps/pdf/stpap523.pdf.
11. Hahn, A.V.G., The Petrochemical Industry. Market and Economics. 1970, McGraw-Hill.
12. Jones, S.B., Zhu, Y., Techno-economic Analysis for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Gasoline via the Methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) Process. 2009.
13. Kamm, B., Gruber, P.R., Kamm, M., Biorefineries-industrial Processes and Products. Status Quo and Future Directions. Volume 1, 2006, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany.
14. Keffer, C., Shimp, R., Lehni, M., Eco-efficiency Indicators & Reporting. Report on the Status of the Project's Work in Progress and Guideline for Pilot Application., 1999 (Geneva).
15. Kinchin, C.M., Bain, R.L., Hydrogen Production from Biomass via Indirect Gasification: the Impact of NREL Process Development Unit Gasifier Correlations Hydrogen Production from Biomass via Indirect Gasification : the Impact of NREL Process Development Unit Gasifier Correlations. 2009.
16. de Klerk, A., Fischer-Tropsch Refining. 2011, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
17. Lal, R., World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ. Int. 31:4 (2005), 575–584.
18. Le, C.D., Gasification of Biomass: an Investigation of Key Challenges to Advance Acceptance of the Technology. PhD Thesis, 2012, University of Bath Available at: papers2://publication/uuid/C096D5B2–4AEA-4C27-BF92-E2B07C2900F3.
19. Lehni, M., Eco-efficiency. Creating More Value with Less Impact. 2000 Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org.
20. Lurgi, Methanol-to-Propylene. Lurgi MTP process., p.1. 2013 Available at: http://www.engineering-solutions.airliquide.com/en/markets-solutions.html.
21. Lyubomirsky, S., Kurtz, J., Eco-efficiency. Learning Module, WBCSD. 2009 Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/pages/EDocument/EDocumentDetails.aspx?ID=13593.
22. Mendoza, A., et al. Thermogravimetric characterization and gasification of pecan nut shells. Bioresour. Technol. 198 (2015), 634–641, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.069.
23. Moses, C.A., Bernstein, H., Impact Study on the Use of Biomass-derived Fuels in Gas Turbines for Power Generation. Southwest R.I, 1994.
24. Nikolaou, A., Remrova, M., Jeliazkov, I., Biomass Availability in Europe. 2003, EU Energy.
25. OECD, Eco-efficiency. 1998, OECD, Paris.
26. Paster, M., Pellegrino, J.L., Carole, T.M., Industrial Bioproducts: Today and Tomorrow. 2003.
27. Ruiz, J.A.A., et al. Biomass gasification for electricity generation: review of current technology barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18 (2013), 174–183 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364032112005631.
28. SAGARPA, Atlas Agroalimentario 2013, México: Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural. 2013 Pesca y Alimentación. Available at: http://www.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx/atlas2013/.
29. SAGARPA, SIAP – Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera » Datos Abiertos. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural. 2014 Pesca y Alimentación. Available at: http://www.siap.gob.mx/datos-abiertos/ (Accessed 19 April 2016).
30. Saling, P., et al. Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF : the method. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7:4 (2002), 203–218.
31. Schubert, P., et al. Fischer-tropsch Archive. Emerging Fuels Technology. 2000, 27 Available at: http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/ (Accessed 01 July 2016).
32. Shonnard, D.R., Kicherer, A., Saling, P., Industrial applications using BASF eco-efficiency analysis: perspectives on green engineering principles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:23 (2003), 5340–5348 Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11956039&site=ehost-live.
33. Smil, V., Crop Residues : agriculture ' s largest harvest. BioScience 49:4 (1999), 299–308.
34. Spath, P., et al. Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly Heated Gasifier. 2005.
35. Stigson, B., WBCSD OECD Workshop - Eco-efficiency: from Principle to Practice. 1999, 1–9 March 15, 1999.
36. Stranges, A.N., Germany's Synthetic Fuel Industry 1927-45. 2003, College Station, Texas Available at: http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/presentations/AIChE 2003 Spring National Meeting/Paper 80a Stranges germany.pdf.
37. Turton, R., et al. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes Fourth Edi., Upper Saddle River. 2012, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
38. Uhlman, B.W., Saling, P., Measuring and communicating sustainability through Eco-efficiency analysis. Chem. Eng. Prog. 106:12 (2010), 17–29.
39. Verfaillie, H.A., Bidwell, R., Eco-efficiency: a Guide to Reporting Company Performance. 2000.
40. WBCSD and UNEP, Cleaner Production and Eco-efficiency Complementary Approaches to Sustainable Development. 1998, 12.
41. Wisner, R., Ethanol, Gasoline, Crude Oil and Corn Prices: Are the Relationships Changing?. 2014 Available at: http://www.agmrc.org/renewable-energy/ethanol/ethanol-gasoline-crude-oil-and-corn-prices-are-the-relationships-changing/.