Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 98, Issue , 2018, Pages 144-145

  Pieper, Dawid ^a   Allers, Katharina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; BUDGET; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85038823904     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.027     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Ioannidis, J.P.A., How to make more published research true. PLoS Med, 11(10), 2014, e1001747.
2. Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374:9683 (2009), 86–89.
3. De Angelis, C., Drazen, J.M., Frizelle, F.A., Haug, C., Hoey, J., Horton, R., et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004), 477–478.
4. Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Research in progress blog. [Internet], 2015 Available at http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/01/05/planning-a-systematic-review-think-protocols/. Accessed 23 October 2017.
5. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 1.
6. Ioannidis, J.P., The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 94:3 (2016), 485–514.
7. Elliott, J.H., Synnot, A., Turner, T., Simmonds, M., Akl, E.A., McDonald, S., et al. Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how. J Clin Epidemiol 91 (2017), 23–30.
8. Lucenteforte, E., Moja, L., Pecoraro, V., Conti, A.A., Conti, A., Crudeli, E., et al. Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 68 (2015), 246–256.
9. Passon, A.M., Drabik, A., Sawicki, P.T., Quality scores do not predict discrepant statistical significances among meta-analyses on different targets of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 1356–1366.
10. Bolland, M.J., Grey, A., A case study of discordant overlapping meta-analyses: vitamin d supplements and fracture. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e115934.
11. Zhao, J.G., Wang, J., Long, L., Surgical versus conservative treatments for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine, 94(26), 2015, e1057.