COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1171-1179

  Mokkink, L B ^a   de Vet, H C W ^a   Prinsen, C A C ^a   Patrick, D L ^b   Alonso, J ^c   Bouter, L M ^a,d   Terwee, C B ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Measurement properties; Outcome measurement instruments; Quality assessment; Risk of bias; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CONSENSUS BASED STANDARDS FOR THE SELECTION OF HEALTH MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS CHECKLIST; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; RISK; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CONSENSUS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH STATUS; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS; CHECKLIST; CONSENSUS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 85038398381     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ioannidis, J. P., Greenland, S., Hlatky, M. A., Khoury, M. J., Macleod, M. R., Moher, D., et al. (2014). Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet, 383(9912), 166–175.
2. Walton, M. K., Powers, J. H., Hobart, J., Patrick, D. L., Marquis, P., Vamvakas, S., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation—report of the ISPOR clinical outcomes assessment-emerging good practices for outcome research task force. Value in Health, 18(6), 741–752.
3. Prinsen, C. A., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C., et al. (2017). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (submitted).
4. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.
5. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.
6. Whiting, P. F., et al. (2011). QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), 529–536.
7. Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & De Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.
8. Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Chiarotto, A., De Vet, H. C., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2017). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of health-related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Delphi study (submitted).
9. Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H. C., et al. (2017). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); user manual. Retrieved 2017 from http://www.cosmin.nl.
10. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved February 7, 2017 from http://www.handbook.cochrane.org.
11. Fayers, P. M., Hand, D. J., Bjordal, K., & Groenvold, M. (1997). Causal indicators in quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 6(5), 393–406.
12. De Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2010). Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & De Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.
14. Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., et al. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205.
15. Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendivil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Value in Health, 11(4), 700–708.
16. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., De Boer, M. R., Van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.
17. Francis, D. O., McPheeters, M. L., Noud, M., Penson, D. F., & Feurer, I. D. (2016). Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 129.
18. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.