Use and Impacts of Campbell Systematic Reviews on Policy, Practice, and Research

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 13-18

  Maynard, Brandy R ^a   Dell, Nathaniel A ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

methodological article; mixed methods; research impact; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL WELFARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85038375731     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049731517722637     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altmetric (2016). How is the Altmetric attention score calculated? Retrieved from https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated-
2. Armstrong R., Pettman T., Burford B., Doyle J., Waters E., (2012). Tracking and understanding the utility of Cochrane reviews for public health decision-making. Journal of Public Health, 34, 309–313.
3. Bastian H., Glasziou P., Chalmers I., (2010). Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Med, 7, e1000326. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
4. Bero L. A., Jadad A. R., (1997). How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 37–42.
5. Bunn F., Trivedi D., Alderson P., Hamilton L., Martin A., Iliffe S., (2014). The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: A mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research. Systematic Reviews, 3, 125.
6. Cohen G., Schroeder J., Newson R., King L., Rychetnik L., Milat A. J., …Chapman S. (2015). Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: Testing a new impact assessment tool. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13, 3. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-13-3
7. Dinsmore A., Allen L., Dolby K., (2014). Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biology, 12, e1002003. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002003
8. Hanney S. R., Watt A., Jones T. H., Metcalf L., (2013). Conducting retrospective impact analysis to inform a medical research charity’s funding strategies: The case of Asthma UK. Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 9, 17. doi:10.1186/1710-1492-9-17
9. MacRoberts M. H., MacRoberts B. R., (2010). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1–12.
10. Moed H. F., Halevi G., (2015). Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1988–2002.
11. Mulrow C. D., (1994). Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 309, 597–599.
12. Nutley S. M., Walter I., Davies H. T. O., (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
13. Penfield T., Baker M. J., Scoble R., Wykes M. C., (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review. Research Evaluation, 23, 21–32.
14. Petrosino A., (2013). Reflections on the genesis of the Campbell Collaboration. The Experimental Criminologist, 8, 9–12.
15. Piwowar H., (2013). Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39, 8–9. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404
16. Shen J., Li Y., Clarke M., Du L., Wang L., Zhong D. (2014). Production and citation of Cochrane systematic reviews: A bibliometrics analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jebm.12101
17. Soydan H., (2008). Applying randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 311–318.
18. Tricco A. C., Cardoso R., Thomas S. M., Motiwala S., Sullivan S., Kealey M. R., …Shepperd S. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 11, 4. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1
19. Veletsianos G., (2012). Higher education scholars’ participation and practices on twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 336–349.
20. Weller K. (2015). Social media and altmetrics: An overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact. In Welpe I. M., Wollersheim J., Ringelhan S., Osterloh M., (Eds.), Incentives and performance (pp. 261–276). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.