Relative Dispersion in Fully Developed Turbulence: The Richardson’s Law and Intermittency Corrections

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 88, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 4-

  Boffetta, G ^a   Sokolov, I M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038340313     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.094501     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. L. F. Richardson, Proc. R. Soc. London A 110, 709 (1926).
2. A. Monin and A. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975), Vol. 2.
3. M. C. Jullien, J. Paret, and P. Tabeling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2872 (1999).
4. S. Ott and J. Mann, J. Fluid Mech. 422, 207 (2000).
5. F. W. Elliott, Jr. and A. J. Majda, Phys. Fluids 8, 1052 (1996).
6. J. C. H. Fung and J. C. Vassilicos, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1677 (1998).
7. N. Zovari and A. Babiano, Physica (Amsterdam) 76D, 318 (1994).
8. G. Boffetta and I. M. Sokolov, e-print nlin.CD/0009047.
9. A. M. Obukhov, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 5, 453 (1941).
10. G. Boffetta, A. Celani, A. Crisanti, and A. Vulpiani, Phys. Rev. E 60, 6734 (1999).
11. G. K. Batchelor, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 345 (1952).
12. R. Kraichnan, Phys. Fluids 10, 1937 (1966).
13. R. Kraichnan, Phys. Fluids 11, 945 (1968).
14. G. Falkovich, K. Gawedzki, and M. Vergassola, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 913 (2001).
15. I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5528 (1999).
16. I. M. Sokolov, J. Klafter, and A. Blumen, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2717 (2000).
17. P. Castiglione, A. Mazzino, P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, and A. Vulpiani, Physica (Amsterdam) 134D, 75 (1999).
18. Shiyi Chen, Gary D. Doolen, Robert H. Kraichnan, and Zhen-Su She, Phys. Fluids A 5, 458 (1993).
19. V. Artale, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, M. Cencini, and A. Vulpiani, Phys. Fluids A 9, 3162 (1997).
20. U. Frisch, Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
21. It may seem that the (Formula presented)rd moment of (Formula presented), not affected by intermittency, may give a better estimate for (Formula presented) than its first moment, Eq. 5. This is not the case, due to a remarkably strong (Formula presented) dependence of (Formula presented) and to its strong sensitivity to temporal correlations. The corresponding results will be discussed elsewhere.
22. R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Massaioli, and S. Succi, Phys. Rev. E 48, R29 (1993).
23. A. La Porta, G. A. Voth, A. M. Crawford, J. Alexander, and E. Bodenschatz, Nature (London) 409, 1017 (2001).