Coherent effects in double-barrier ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet junctions

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 13, 2002, Pages 1-7

  Božović, Miloš ^a   Radović, Zoran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038331104     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.134524     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. G. A. Prinz, Phys. Today 48 (4), 58 (1995).
2. M. Osofsky, J. Supercond. 13, 209 (2000).
3. G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982).
4. A. F. Andreev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 46, 1823 (1964)
5. Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228 (1964)].
6. A. Furusaki and M. Tsukada, Solid State Commun. 78, 299 (1991).
7. Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995).
8. S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000).
9. M. J. M. de Jong and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1657 (1995).
10. S. Kashiwaya, Y. Tanaka, N. Yoshida, and M. R. Beasley, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3572 (1999).
11. N. Yoshida, Y. Tanaka, J. Inoue, and S. Kashiwaya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 1071 (1999).
12. I. Žutić and O. T. Valls, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6320 (1999).
13. J.-X. Zhu, B. Friedman, and C. S. Ting, Phys. Rev. B 59, 9558 (1999).
14. P. M. Tedrow and R. Meservey, Phys. Rep. 238, 173 (1994).
15. C. L. Platt, A. S. Katz, E. P. Price, R. C. Dynes, and A. E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. B 61, 68 (2000).
16. R. J. Soulen, Jr., J. M. Byers, M. S. Osofsky, B. Nadgorny, T. Ambrose, S. F. Cheng, P. R. Broussard, C. T. Tanaka, J. Nowak, J. S. Moodera, A. Barry, and J. M. D. Coey, Science 282, 85 (1998).
17. G. J. Strijkers, Y. Ji, F. Y. Yang, C. L. Chien, and J. M. Byers, Phys. Rev. B 63, 104510 (2001).
18. S. K. Upadhyay, A. Palanisami, R. N. Louie, and R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3247 (1998).
19. V. A. Vas’ko, K. R. Nikolaev, V. A. Larkin, P. A. Kraus, and A. M. Goldman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 844 (1998).
20. F. J. Jedema, B. J. van Wees, B. H. Hoving, A. T. Filip, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 60, 16 549 (1999).
21. S. Guéron, H. Pothier, N. O. Birge, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3025 (1996).
22. V. T. Petrashov, I. A. Sosnin, I. Cox, A. Parsons, and C. Troadec, J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, 689 (2000).
23. M. A. Sillanpää, T. T. Heikkilä, R. K. Lindell, and P. J. Hakonen, Europhys. Lett. 56, 590 (2001).
24. S. Takahashi, H. Imamura, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3911 (1999).
25. Z. Zheng, D. Y. Xing, G. Sun, and J. Dong, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14 326 (2000).
26. M. Zareyan, W. Belzig, and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 308 (2001).
27. T. M. Klapwijk, G. E. Blonder, and M. Tinkham, Physica B 109-110, 1657 (1982).
28. T. Hoss, C. Strunk, T. Nussbaumer, R. Huber, U. Staufer, and C. Schönenberger, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4079 (2000).
29. Å. Ingerman, G. Johansson, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Phys. Rev. B 64, 144504 (2001).
30. A. Brinkman and A. A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11 297 (2000).
31. W. J. Tomasch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 672 (1965);
32. Phys. Rev. Lett.W. J. Tomasch16, 16 (1966).
33. W. L. McMillan and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 85 (1966).
34. J. M. Rowell and W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 453 (1966).
35. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 175, 559 (1968).
36. J. Demers and A. Griffin, Can. J. Phys. 49, 285 (1971).
37. O. Nesher and G. Koren, Phys. Rev. B 60, 9287 (1999).
38. J. M. E. Geers, M. B. S. Hesselberth, J. Aarts, and A. A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 094506 (2001).
39. I. Baladié, A. Buzdin, N. Ryzhanova, and A. Vedyayev, Phys. Rev. B 63, 054518 (2001).
40. V. I. Fal’ko, A. F. Volkov, and C. Lambert, Phys. Rev. B 60,15 394 (1999).
41. E. McCann, V. I. Fal’ko, A. F. Volkov, and C. J. Lambert, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6015 (2000).
42. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloe, Quantum Mechanics (Hermann, Paris, 1977s).
43. M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).
44. In thin superconducting films the spatial variation of the self-consistent pair potential is negligible and solutions retain the same form. The only difference coming from the proximity effect is (formula presented) smaller than the bulk value, especially for transparent interfaces.
45. Z. Zheng, Y. Qi, D. Y. Xing, and J. Dong, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14 505 (1999).
46. The parameter Z in our definition differs from the BTK by a factor of 2.
47. A. Dimoulas, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9729 (2000).